Sealing Hellium at Higher Temperatures: Possible Solutions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pkruse
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sealing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of sealing helium at elevated temperatures, with a focus on potential solutions and materials that can maintain low leak rates. Participants explore various sealing methods, materials, and designs suitable for different temperature ranges, including applications that may reach up to 1800 degrees Fahrenheit.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that Indium seals can achieve extremely low leak rates at ambient temperatures but are unsuitable for high-temperature applications due to their low melting point.
  • Another participant expresses a lack of good sealing ideas and considers using Indium as a brazing material for cooling joints, questioning the feasibility of using Indium for soldering.
  • A different participant suggests that CF flanges with standard copper gaskets can be effective up to 450°C (around 800°F), but expresses uncertainty about sealing at higher temperatures.
  • One participant reflects on past experiences with modified CF gaskets achieving near-zero leak rates in high-pressure helium systems, indicating that careful design can yield effective results.
  • A participant proposes the idea of stacking multiple seals in an airlock configuration, although they admit to lacking knowledge on the subject.
  • Another participant mentions that welding seams could be a solution, but cautions about the need for high-quality materials to prevent helium leakage through microstructural defects.
  • One participant discusses the concept of creating a labyrinth design along the leak path, using either Indium or copper to block leaks, and emphasizes the importance of maintaining low leak rates for industrial safety in contaminated helium applications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of ideas and potential solutions, but there is no consensus on a definitive method for sealing helium at high temperatures. Multiple competing views and approaches remain, with ongoing exploration of various materials and designs.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their current knowledge and the need for further testing and design modifications to ensure effective sealing at higher temperatures. There are also concerns about the suitability of certain materials for high-pressure systems.

Pkruse
Messages
465
Reaction score
2
Hellium leaks through all normal seals. I've used Indium seals to get leak rates down as low as 0.0000000001 grams/sec, but that only works for normal ambient temperatures. (Customer requirements were no greater than ten to the minus six grams/sec. The Indium seals were orders of magnitued below that.) The stuff has a low melting point, which prohibits its use in my current application.

Has anyone successfully sealed Hellium at higher temperatures? I'm talking about a number of different temperature ranges, some of them up to 1800 degrees F. It is possible that some future applications will be higher than that. I'm looking for any ideas for temperatures starting as low as 400 degrees F, since some of the appliacations are not so high.

I understand that I will have to accept some leakage at rates higher than customers have found acceptable in previous applications. We just need to keep the leak rates as low as reasonable.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Nobody has any good ideas?

I could not find any, either.

Looks like I might be reduced to cooling the joints and using Indium. Maybe I could find a way to use Indium as a brazing material to install the copper cooling tube, and then find a really clever means of using the soldier surface as a sealing surface.

Anyone ever braze or soldier with Indium?
 
CF flanges can be used up to at least 450C (around 800 F) with standard copper gaskets and the leak rate should not be a problem.
But I have no idea what you would use for temperatures above that.
 
Thanks much, f95toli. I had not given them a thought because while they are awesome for vacuum systems, the suppliers of CF seals all have warnings in their literature against using them for pressure systems. But if I modify the flange design a little and test appropriately, I can probably sell the concept.

On a side note, many years ago I worked on a high pressure Helium system that had a near zero leak design requirement. On the flare fittings, we simply used a modified CF gasket on a standard flare fitting, and got leak rates that we needed some very expensive equipment to measure any leak rates at all. The atoms must have almost been leaking out one at a time. That also was a pressure system rather than vacuum.
 
Would there be any advantage to stacking multiple seals (like an airlock sort of setup)?
I know nothing of the subject; just thinking out loud.
 
We used to weld the seams. But then again, I don't know of anyone going that high. You'd better have great materials, or you'll have helium wiggling through defects in the microstructure.
 
CF seals do something of that effect on vacuum systems. If I use that concept for a high pressure system, I'll redesign the interface to make it more so. Certainly the Indium seals for lower temperature Helium do that extremely well. Essentially, we are talking about making a labrinth along the leak path, and packing that labrinth with either Indium for low temperature applications, or copper at higher temperatures. Clamping the flange together provides the pressure to force either the Indium or the Copper to flow through that labrinth leak path, thereby blocking it.

In one potential application, the Helium may be contaminated such that we must keep our leak rate down very low as a matter in Industrial Safety.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 287 ·
10
Replies
287
Views
28K