Search patterns in observational studies

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the methods and considerations involved in selecting stars for observational studies in the search for exoplanets, particularly focusing on the challenges of studying nearby stars compared to more distant ones. It touches on detection methods, star characteristics, and the current knowledge about nearby stars.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how astronomers prioritize which stars to examine for exoplanets, noting the contrast between distant discoveries and the limited knowledge of nearby stars.
  • Another participant explains that detection methods, such as direct imaging and infrared imaging, dictate which stars can be observed, emphasizing the importance of star characteristics like age and type.
  • It is suggested that supergiant stars are generally poor candidates for planet detection due to their high mass and low likelihood of observable shifts caused by orbiting planets.
  • A participant challenges the notion that little is known about nearby stars, asserting that astronomers have substantial knowledge about them and providing links to relevant articles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the extent of knowledge regarding nearby stars, with some asserting that significant information exists while others question why more isn't known about them.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying assumptions about the capabilities of different observational methods and the characteristics of stars that influence detection success. There is also a reliance on external articles to support claims, which may introduce additional perspectives not fully explored in the thread.

stargazer3
Messages
44
Reaction score
3
Hello Physics Forums!

I've just read about the discovery of GJ 667Cc, and it made me ponder on how do astonomers develop the sequence of stars to be examined in search for exoplanets? I know that some telescopes, like Kepler mission, are just collecting raw data from a certain area of space, but what about more flexible observatories? In other words, why, discovering so many distant exoplanets, we know so little about the closest to Sun hundred or so stars (we are trying to find the closest habitable planet, aren't we)?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It depends on the detection method. For example, if you wanted to do direct imaging to detect planets, your telescopes intrinsic resolution limit would set the upper boundary for the distance the star could be at, so you would image stars that were close by. And even then, if you were using Infrared imaging to detect the heat from young star systems and their planets, you would have to observe stars that were still young enough for their planets to be very hot and emit infrared radiation.

Beyond that, the type of star itself is also a major feature that you must consider. Huge, bright, supergiant stars are usually poor candidates for most detection methods,(I think) as their masses are so high that any planets in orbit would barely cause the star to shift around, making it much more difficult to detect planets using the radial velocity method. These stars would also have a much smaller amount of surface area become blocked by a transiting planet, reducing the chances of using that method as well. Plus, most people are more interested in "sun like" stars, as the star system would be much more similar to Earth's.

In other words, why, discovering so many distant exoplanets, we know so little about the closest to Sun hundred or so stars (we are trying to find the closest habitable planet, aren't we)?

Who says we don't know much?
 
Drakkith is right, astronomers do know quite a lot about our nearest stars.
Here is an article I found interesting about the Altha Centauri system. Has nice charts displaying what the orbital distances of such planets might be.


Alpha Centauri
A Candidate for Terrestrial Planets And Intelligent Life
http://aether.lbl.gov/www/classes/p139/speed/Alpha-Centauri.html


The following article is also relevant to your question.

 
Thanks a lot for both responses, they cover everything I wanted to know to large extend.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K