Searching for Convergent Sequence: lim_n→∞ n(s_n-s_{n-1})=∞

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Poopsilon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a convergent sequence \( s_n \) such that \( \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} n(s_n-s_{n-1})=\infty \). Participants explore various sequences and their properties, particularly in relation to Cesàro summation and convergence behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a convergent sequence \( s_n \) that meets the specified limit condition.
  • Another participant suggests \( s_n = \frac{(-1)^n}{\sqrt{n}} \) as a potential candidate, noting that it converges but may not satisfy the limit condition depending on the parity of \( n \).
  • A subsequent reply questions the original notation and clarifies that the suggestion may work under certain interpretations, but also points out potential insufficiencies.
  • One participant discusses Cesàro summation and explores the conditions under which \( \lim \sigma_n = \sigma \) while \( \lim s_n \neq \sigma \), indicating that the original condition may be necessary but not sufficient.
  • Another participant provides an example of a sequence \( a_n \) that diverges while its Cesàro sum converges to \( \frac{1}{2} \), prompting further discussion on convergence preservation.
  • There is a clarification about the implications of convergence preservation in relation to Cesàro summation, referencing a theorem by Toeplitz.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the suitability of proposed sequences and the implications of Cesàro summation. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the existence of a sequence that meets all specified conditions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the behavior of certain sequences under the limit condition and the implications of Cesàro summation. There are unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the convergence properties of the sequences discussed.

Poopsilon
Messages
288
Reaction score
1
I'm looking for a convergent sequence [tex]s_n[/tex] such that:

[tex]lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}n(s_n-s_{n-1})=\infty[/tex]

I've already gone pretty far afield in my hunt for such a sequence, so I thought I'd enlist the help of you fine folks in my search.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are willing to accept conditionally convergent series, try sn=(-1)n/√n.
 
Poopsilon said:
I'm looking for a convergent sequence [tex]s_n[/tex] such that:

[tex]lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}n(s_n-s_{n-1})=\infty[/tex]

I've already gone pretty far afield in my hunt for such a sequence, so I thought I'd enlist the help of you fine folks in my search.

mathman said:
If you are willing to accept conditionally convergent series, try sn=(-1)n/√n.

He is talking about a sequence, not a series. At least that's what he said although he did use notation that suggests partial sums of a series. Your sequence converges (not conditionally). If he meant what he said, your suggestion may work depending on what he really wants. If n is even, n(sn-sn-1) >0 and goes to ∞ through the subsequence of even numbers.But if n is odd it → -∞. Perhaps that is good enough.
 
I think mathman may have misspoke when he said series, his sequence will work, all I needed was the absolute value of n(s_n-s_n-1) to increase without bound. Although for my ultimate purpose it turns out to be insufficient.

I'm taking a look at Cesaro summation: [tex]\sigma_n=\frac{s_0+s_1+...+s_n}{n+1}[/tex]
and trying to find a case where [tex]\lim\sigma_n=\sigma[/tex] while [tex]\lim s_n\neq\sigma.[/tex]
And if I am interpreting my book correctly the condition for the sequence s_n given in my original post is a necessary condition for this to occur, but upon doing the computation with mathman's example it appears not sufficient:
[tex]Set\;\; s_0=0,\;\; define\;\; s_n=\sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{(-1)^k}{\sqrt{k}}\;\; for\;\; n\geq 1,\;\; and\;\; assume\;\; that\;\; \sigma_n=\sigma.\;\;\;\; Then\;\;[/tex][tex]\sigma_n=\frac{1}{n+1}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{(-1)^i(n-i+1)}{\sqrt{i}}[/tex][tex]=\frac{1}{n+1}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{(-1)^i(n+1)}{\sqrt{i}}-\frac{1}{n+1}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{(-1)^ii}{\sqrt{i}}[/tex][tex]=\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{(-1)^i}{\sqrt{i}}-\frac{1}{n+1}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\frac{(-1)^ii}{\sqrt{i}}[/tex][tex]=s_n+\frac{1}{n+1}\sum_{i=1}^{n}(-1)^i\sqrt{i}\rightarrow \lim s_n=\sigma\;\; as\;\; n\rightarrow\infty.[/tex]
Where the penultimate equality follows by definition, and the ultimate by our assumption.

So I'm curious if either of you can come up with a sequence which does provide different limits for sigma_n and s_n.

P.S. does anyone know how to not automatically go down to the next line every time one codes in some latex, it used to not do that but I think physicsforum like changed their latex format and now it does, thanks.

Edit: Actually I'm not entirely sure that [tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{1}{n+1}\sum_{i=1}^{n}(-1)^i\sqrt{i}=0.[/tex]
If not than mathman's sequence does work after all.
 
Last edited:
Poopsilon said:
I'm taking a look at Cesaro summation: [tex]\sigma_n=\frac{s_0+s_1+...+s_n}{n+1}[/tex]
and trying to find a case where [tex]\lim\sigma_n=\sigma[/tex] while [tex]\lim s_n\neq\sigma.[/tex]

I assume you are aware that Cesaro summation is convergence preserving. Look at the sequence {an} where an = 1 if n is even and 0 if n is odd. Here σn → 1/2 while {an} diverges.
 
By convergence preserving are you implying that if both sigma_n and s_n converge than they must converge to the same value?
 
Poopsilon said:
By convergence preserving are you implying that if both sigma_n and s_n converge than they must converge to the same value?

Yes. If a sequence converges then its Cesaro sum converges to the same limit. There is a general theorem by Toeplitz giving a conditions on a summability matrix that make it convergence preserving, which the Cesaro sum matrix satisfies. You can read about it at

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silverman–Toeplitz_theorem

It is also not difficult to prove that result for Cesaro summation directly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K