Second derivative of a unit vector from The Feynman Lectures

Click For Summary
In Feynman's Lectures on Physics, the radiation equation highlights the second derivative of the unit vector ##\hat{e}_{r'}##, which points to the charge's apparent position. The unit vector's end moves along a curve, resulting in two components of acceleration: a transverse component and a radial component. The radial component's effect diminishes as the distance increases, varying more rapidly than the inverse square of the distance, while the transverse component decreases as ##\frac{1}{r}##. The discussion seeks clarification on how to demonstrate the behavior of the radial component, emphasizing the need for a deeper understanding of its variation with distance. Overall, the thread explores the complexities of vector behavior in electromagnetic radiation.
ZetaOfThree
Gold Member
Messages
109
Reaction score
23
In the Feynman Lectures on Physics chapter 28, Feynman explains the radiation equation $$\vec{E}=\frac{-q}{4\pi\epsilon_0 c^2}\,
\frac{d^2\hat{e}_{r'}}{dt^2}$$
The unit vector ##\hat{e}_{r'}## is pointed toward the apparent position of the charge. Of course, the end of ##\hat{e}_{r'}## goes on a slight curve, so that its acceleration has two components. One is the transverse piece, because the end of it goes up and down, and the other is a radial piece because it stays on a sphere. It is easy to demonstrate that the latter is much smaller and varies as the inverse square of ##r## when ##r## is very great. This is easy to see, for when we imagine that we move a given source farther and farther away, then the wigglings of ##\hat{e}_{r'}## look smaller and smaller, inversely as the distance, but the radial component of acceleration is varying much more rapidly than inversely as the distance.

The fact that the transverse component varies as ##\frac{1}{r}## seems fairly obvious to me since what matters is just the angle through which the charge moves as seen from the distant observer. However, I'm not sure how to show what he claims for the radial component. Can someone help me see clearly why this is true?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not finding help at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us?
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
704
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
746
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K