Second derivative of a unit vector from The Feynman Lectures

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the second derivative of a unit vector, specifically the unit vector ##\hat{e}_{r'}## as described in Chapter 28 of The Feynman Lectures on Physics. The radiation equation $$\vec{E}=\frac{-q}{4\pi\epsilon_0 c^2}\,\frac{d^2\hat{e}_{r'}}{dt^2}$$ illustrates how the unit vector's end moves along a curve, resulting in two components of acceleration: a transverse component that varies as ##\frac{1}{r}## and a radial component that decreases more rapidly than inversely with distance. The discussion highlights the need for clarity on the radial component's behavior as the source distance increases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, particularly derivatives of unit vectors.
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic theory and the radiation equation.
  • Knowledge of inverse square laws in physics.
  • Basic comprehension of Feynman's Lectures on Physics, particularly Chapter 28.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the radiation equation in electromagnetic theory.
  • Explore the concept of unit vectors and their derivatives in vector calculus.
  • Investigate the behavior of acceleration components in spherical coordinates.
  • Review the implications of the inverse square law in various physical contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, educators teaching vector calculus, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of radiation theory.

ZetaOfThree
Gold Member
Messages
109
Reaction score
23
In the Feynman Lectures on Physics chapter 28, Feynman explains the radiation equation $$\vec{E}=\frac{-q}{4\pi\epsilon_0 c^2}\,
\frac{d^2\hat{e}_{r'}}{dt^2}$$
The unit vector ##\hat{e}_{r'}## is pointed toward the apparent position of the charge. Of course, the end of ##\hat{e}_{r'}## goes on a slight curve, so that its acceleration has two components. One is the transverse piece, because the end of it goes up and down, and the other is a radial piece because it stays on a sphere. It is easy to demonstrate that the latter is much smaller and varies as the inverse square of ##r## when ##r## is very great. This is easy to see, for when we imagine that we move a given source farther and farther away, then the wigglings of ##\hat{e}_{r'}## look smaller and smaller, inversely as the distance, but the radial component of acceleration is varying much more rapidly than inversely as the distance.

The fact that the transverse component varies as ##\frac{1}{r}## seems fairly obvious to me since what matters is just the angle through which the charge moves as seen from the distant observer. However, I'm not sure how to show what he claims for the radial component. Can someone help me see clearly why this is true?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not finding help at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K