Second Order Differential equation Bessel-type

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a second-order differential equation of the form -d²y/dx² + (3/x) dy/dx + (x² + gx⁴ + 2)y = 0, which is related to a negative-dimensional anharmonic oscillator. Participants suggest converting the equation into a Bessel-like form and applying the general solution for confluent hypergeometric differential equations. Key methods mentioned include the variation of parameters, perturbative expansion, and the Frobenius method for obtaining solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order differential equations
  • Familiarity with confluent hypergeometric functions
  • Knowledge of the Frobenius method for series solutions
  • Basic concepts of perturbative expansions in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of the Frobenius method to differential equations
  • Explore the properties and applications of confluent hypergeometric functions
  • Learn about perturbative methods in solving differential equations
  • Investigate Bessel functions and their relation to second-order differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers dealing with differential equations, particularly those interested in advanced topics such as negative-dimensional systems and specialized solution techniques.

Juan Carlos
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hello!

Im trying to solve this second order differential equation:

\begin{equation*}
-\dfrac{d^2y}{dx^2}+\dfrac{3}{x}\dfrac{dy}{dx}+(x^2+gx^4+2)y=0
\end{equation*}

Any idea?

Maybe it could be converted to a Bessel-like equation (?) with an appropriate change of variables.

The equation arises when your are considering a -2 dimensional (yes!, its correct: "Negative dimension") anhamonic oscillator.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, there is a proposition that says, if you have an equation of this kind:

## y''+P(x)y'+Q(x)y=0##
where ##P## and ##Q## continuous on ##I## and if ##\lambda(x)## is a particular solution with ##\lambda(x)\not=0##, then the general solution is:

##y(x)=\lambda(x)\left(c_{1}+c_{2}\int\frac{e^{-\int P(x)dx}}{\lambda(x)^2}dx\right)##

where ##c_{1},c_{2}## are constants.

So you can start to search a particular solution and then apply this...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Juan Carlos
I not sure how helpful this will be, but I think you're equation is a general confluent hypergeometric differential equation: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GeneralConfluentHypergeometricDifferentialEquation.html.

The general solutions are:

y_1 = x^{-A} e^{-m\left(x\right)} F\left(a;b; h\left(x\right)\right)
y_2 = x^{-A} e^{-m\left(x\right)} U\left(a;b; h\left(x\right)\right)

where F\left(a;b;h\left(x\right)\right) and U\left(a;b;h\left(x\right)\right) are confluent hypergeometric functions of the first and second kind.
Admittedly it can be challenging to identify the functions m\left(x\right) and h\left(x\right) . I'd try a few simple functions to see if you can make it work.

Alternatively what is the constant g? Is it a small number? Can you use a perturbative expansion to find an approximate solution?
 
Ssnow said:
Hi, there is a proposition that says, if you have an equation of this kind:

## y''+P(x)y'+Q(x)y=0##
where ##P## and ##Q## continuous on ##I## and if ##\lambda(x)## is a particular solution with ##\lambda(x)\not=0##, then the general solution is:

##y(x)=\lambda(x)\left(c_{1}+c_{2}\int\frac{e^{-\int P(x)dx}}{\lambda(x)^2}dx\right)##

where ##c_{1},c_{2}## are constants.

So you can start to search a particular solution and then apply this...
Ssnow said:
Hi, there is a proposition that says, if you have an equation of this kind:

## y''+P(x)y'+Q(x)y=0##
where ##P## and ##Q## continuous on ##I## and if ##\lambda(x)## is a particular solution with ##\lambda(x)\not=0##, then the general solution is:

##y(x)=\lambda(x)\left(c_{1}+c_{2}\int\frac{e^{-\int P(x)dx}}{\lambda(x)^2}dx\right)##

where ##c_{1},c_{2}## are constants.

So you can start to search a particular solution and then apply this...

Variation of parameters! I'll give it a try!

Thanks
 
the_wolfman said:
I not sure how helpful this will be, but I think you're equation is a general confluent hypergeometric differential equation: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GeneralConfluentHypergeometricDifferentialEquation.html.

The general solutions are:

y_1 = x^{-A} e^{-m\left(x\right)} F\left(a;b; h\left(x\right)\right)
y_2 = x^{-A} e^{-m\left(x\right)} U\left(a;b; h\left(x\right)\right)

where F\left(a;b;h\left(x\right)\right) and U\left(a;b;h\left(x\right)\right) are confluent hypergeometric functions of the first and second kind.
Admittedly it can be challenging to identify the functions m\left(x\right) and h\left(x\right) . I'd try a few simple functions to see if you can make it work.

Alternatively what is the constant g? Is it a small number? Can you use a perturbative expansion to find an approximate solution?

Thanks I will try with this "factorization" procedure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
530
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K