See far away objects in space in real time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter robertito
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impossibility of observing distant objects in space in real time due to the finite speed of light. Participants clarify that viewing a planet 1000 light years away means observing its state as it was 1000 years ago, not its current condition. The conversation also touches on the complexities of measuring time and distance from different frames of reference, emphasizing that any observation of light emitted in the past cannot be accelerated to provide real-time views. The consensus is that current physics, particularly the principles of special relativity, prohibits seeing events as they happen from such distances.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the speed of light and its implications in astronomy
  • Basic knowledge of special relativity and its principles
  • Familiarity with astronomical measurements and light years
  • Concept of time dilation and reference frames in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the speed of light on astronomical observations
  • Study the principles of special relativity in detail
  • Explore the concept of time dilation and its effects on time measurement
  • Investigate advanced telescopes and their capabilities in observing distant celestial objects
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physics students, and anyone interested in the nature of light and time in the context of space observation.

robertito
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
Hi,

I was asking myself if there is, or might be a way to see far away objects in space in real time? What I mean is that when we look even through the most powerful telescope we always see the past of the object we are looking at, and this past will depend on the distance the object is away from us, right?
So, if a planet is 1000 light years away from us and we have a telescope powerful enough to see its surface like, let's say, in google maps we will see how this surface looked like 1000 years ago. Then, maybe we see life on a planet, a supernova exploded 500 years ago and killed everything and we will see this in 500 years only.
Or maybe we don't see anything but there is life and the problem is that light still didn't reach us.
Is it like this or am I completely wrong?
Thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Yes, the only way to see what happened 500 years ago would be for the light that was emitted 500 years ago to travel at twice the speed of light which - more or less by definition - is not possible :)

For a rigorous discussion, we should probably think about what "500 years ago" means... 500 years on whose clock? :)
 
Thanks for your answer, you clarified something important!
About the clock, I don't know, because that's also something I never understood :) I guess, my clock here on earth? But it's a mechanical device, and this is what confuses me even more! (in the same way that the ruler you leave in the drawer is not measuring anything...)
By the way, you made me remember that I have to make a question about time, but in another place of the forum ;)
 
Yes, because you are saying that "the light is coming from a start 500 light years away", the distance is measured in your frame of reference, the time is measured in your frame of reference. In other words, by a clock sitting stationary next to you.
 
If there is any way to see light of later times (=not light emitted 1000 years ago for clocks on earth) here on earth, this allows time travel or completely ruins special relativity (or both).
I guess, my clock here on earth? But it's a mechanical device, and this is what confuses me even more! (in the same way that the ruler you leave in the drawer is not measuring anything...)
Well, you can use any clock here on earth, including radioactive decays, the orbit of Earth around the sun and so on. You are not limited to a specific clock.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MoM-z14 Any photon with energy above 24.6 eV is going to ionize any atom. K, L X-rays would certainly ionize atoms. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/whats-the-most-distant-galaxy/ The James Webb Space Telescope has found the most distant galaxy ever seen, at the dawn of the cosmos. Again. https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/news/webb-mom-z14 A Cosmic Miracle: A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at zspec = 14.44 Confirmed with JWST...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
730
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
706