Seeing Earth's Formation - Can We?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter locutus7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the feasibility of using telescopes to observe the formation and development of Earth by looking back in time through electromagnetic radiation. Participants examine assumptions about light travel, the implications of the universe's expansion, and the potential for advanced technology to capture historical images of our planet.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that telescopes could theoretically capture images of Earth from its past by observing light that has traveled away from it, assuming advancements in technology.
  • Another participant counters that the light emitted from Earth has been traveling outward in a spherical shell and cannot be captured unless it is redirected, such as through gravitational lensing.
  • A further reply emphasizes that the likelihood of gravitational lensing returning light from early Earth is extremely low, and asserts that photons emitted from Earth are no longer available for observation.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of the universe's expansion on the ability to observe historical events, with one noting that a closed universe scenario is no longer considered likely.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the possibility of observing Earth's past through telescopic means. There is no consensus, as some argue for the potential of advanced technology and gravitational lensing, while others firmly reject the feasibility of such observations.

Contextual Notes

Assumptions about light travel, the nature of gravitational lensing, and the geometry of the universe are discussed but remain unresolved. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of these concepts without reaching a definitive conclusion.

locutus7
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
First time poster and non-cosmologist.

Why can't we use telescopy (across the EM spectrum) to view the formation and development of our planet? Let me explain by laying out some assumptions (correct them if they are inaccurate).

- When we use telescopes (again, I mean x-ray, radio, visual, etc) to capture photons from distant stellar objects, we are in a sense looking back in time. "seeing" a galaxy 10 billion LY away is seeing it as it was 10 billion years ago.

- The photons we collect with our telescopes vary in intensity based on distance and if they are emitted (from a star) or reflected (off a planet). Thus we cannot "see" planets that are too distant as the reflected EM radiation is weaker than that emitted by a stellar object.

- In this scenario we will assume all particles travel not to exceed lightspeed, but let us assume that we may discover other particles such as gravitons that will enhance our capabilities (so we might eventually see images of planets light years away).

- Universe is expanding.

Okay, is it possible, if we could calculate which direction to look, that we could point all of our telescopes (and hypothetical gravitic detectors) to look out 4 billion light years and see the actual formation of our solar system, which would be in a different location than now because of inflation?

And if so, could we look out 2 billion light years (time and distance) and see our nascent planet Earth, and then 1 billion LY and so on and watch our actual planet develop?

Again, assuming an improvement in technology, could this be accomplished, or is my logic flawed?

Thanx in advance.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Hey and welcome to PF.

I'm not sure why you think you would find an image of our own Earth "out there" somewhere. The EM radiation the left the Earth since the beginning of its existence has been faithfully traveling outwards away from it in a spherical shell at precisely the speed of light. Therefore, if you wanted to see this radiation in our current epoch, you would need to turn it around somehow. Of course, we can't well believe there to be a giant mirror out there, but it is, at least theoretically, possible that the light could come back to use via gravitational lensing.

So yes it is possible that we could receive a photon from the early Earth if it was very fortuitously gravitationally lensed such that it came back to the Earth's present position. The expansion of the universe isn't really important here.

(Note: Gravitational waves, i.e gravitons, travel at the speed of light)
 
Thanx, Nabeshin, for replying. I wish I could draw an illustration of what I mean. Basically, if our Earth was in position X two billion years ago, and is now in position Y because space expanded and everything is flying away from each other.

So the reflected photons, gravitons, whatever-trons from Earth X travel 2 billion light years (in a spherical front) and should be able to be captured by our various instruments on or near Earth Y (our current earth), assuming they were sufficiently sensitive.

Thus from Earth we could see the EM emissions from our planet long ago and far away. And if you followed this reasoning to its conclusion, instruments from our current earth, Earth in position Y could view Earth 1 million years ago - 1 million LY away- (we will call it position Z Earth because it would be further from Earth Y as it is more recent and thus more distant due to accelerating space expansion).

In other words, we are viewing an image of Earth 1 million years ago and if our instruments were super-advanced, we might see dinosaurs, etc. Truly looking back in time at our earth.

How is this flawed? I really want to know, and will try to clarify if my point is unclear.
 
Last edited:
locutus7 said:
So the reflected photons, gravitons, whatever-trons from Earth X travel 2 billion light years (in a spherical front) and should be able to be captured by our various instruments on or near Earth Y (our current earth), assuming they were sufficiently sensitive.
No, they can't.

This makes for a nice sci-fi setting where the author can hand-wave the laws of physics goodbye. It is just that, sci-fi. Those photons are long gone, never to be seen again. The only possible exceptions are an fortuitous arrangement of gravitational lenses that curves the light back to us, and a closed, curved universe (some of those remote stars we see is our sun). The former is not just fortuitous, it is outrageously fortuitous. The latter was deemed a remote possibility decades ago, but not any longer. As far as we can tell the universe is flat and very, very big.
 
This thread strongly violates the rules of this forum and is therefore locked.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
747
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
13K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K