Seeing Michio Kaku today. Any questions you'd like me to ask?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SeventhSigma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Michio kaku
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This forum discussion centers on the public perception of Michio Kaku's work, particularly his approach to science communication through popular media. Participants express concern that Kaku's speculative ideas, especially regarding inter-galactic travel and time travel, often blur the line between science and science fiction, leading to misconceptions among the general public. While some acknowledge his role in inspiring interest in science, others criticize his tendency to present unverified theories as plausible futures, which can mislead audiences lacking scientific backgrounds. The consensus suggests a need for clearer communication that distinguishes between established science and speculative ideas.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of science communication principles
  • Familiarity with speculative science concepts
  • Knowledge of the difference between science and science fiction
  • Awareness of public perception of scientific authority
NEXT STEPS
  • Research effective science communication strategies
  • Explore the impact of popular science figures like Neil deGrasse Tyson
  • Investigate the role of speculative science in public understanding
  • Analyze case studies of science communication failures and successes
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for science communicators, educators, and anyone interested in the intersection of science and media, particularly those concerned with the accuracy and impact of popular science narratives.

  • #91
JaredJames said:
You must have missed the part where I said I "have no comment on the guy".

I don't know who he is, don't care, just pointing out a few things I've noted in a general sense.

I've not commented on any distinction between crackpot/mainstream/'popsci' etc, only on what is a common trait.

Again, misreading/misinterpreting/misrepresentation of what I actually have said.

If you really want to get into it, I've had a look at some of his stuff and it seems he pushes certain areas as though they are certainly possible or incredibly likely when in reality there is nothing to support it at all.

Yeah, you definitely need a vacation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
Loren Booda said:
Has anyone here mentioned Kaku's scholarly book (700+ pages) on quantum field theory? It's mostly beyond me.

I used to hang out at Kaku's forum. It was a crazy fun kind of place. All areas were GD. I think one person was banned in the 3 years I was there. It did attract some smart people, who of course I could not understand. There was one very smart mathematician that tried to explain string theory to us laymen, but of course we did not understand. One day I told him that I'd like to understand string theory, and he told me that I should start by getting John M. Lee's book "Introduction to Smooth Manifolds". So I did. Unfortunately, it had been 30 years since I'd taken a calculus class, and the first 3 pages were all Greek, so I put it on the bookshelf with all my other "Gads I want to understand this stuff" books.

I think the forum was most fun in that it introduced me lots of scientists. I actually sent and received a response from Max Tegmark. That was pretty cool. Not since Tim Berners-Lee refused my box of chocolates, was I so delighted.

hmm...

I should go home.

btw, does anyone know who Sunfist was?
 
  • #93
This is not "today" anymore...
 
  • #94
flyingpig said:
This is not "today" anymore...

No, it's still today. It's not yesterday anymore, though.
 
  • #95
Ask him if he smokes a lot of pot, or if it just seems that way.
 
  • #96
Darken-Sol said:
and is he claiming these things exist or may exist in the future? i got the impression he is doing science fiction from the earlier posts. i still haven't had a chance to check out this kaku fellow. at what point does he degenerate to this heretic everyone paints him as?

bump
 
  • #97
lisab said:
No, it's still today. It's not yesterday anymore, though.

Looks like proof of time travel to me. Thanks!
 
  • #98
OmCheeto said:
Looks like proof of time travel to me. Thanks!

I guess not, as it will never be tomorrow. So if you are never there, how can you get back?
 
  • #99
Andre said:
I guess not, as it will never be tomorrow. So if you are never there, how can you get back?

If you don't choose yourself as a preferred reference frame...
 
  • #100
Misericorde said:
If you don't choose yourself as a preferred reference frame...

Is there any reference frame that would permit that?
 
  • #101
JaredJames said:
Is there any reference frame that would permit that?

You could just define any arbitrary set of coordinates; that's why you have past and future light cones around such chosen points. It's purely on paper of course, this isn't something that changes life as we know it, just the process of specifying 4 numbers to designate "you are here" and then everything before and after it.

If you mean a reference frame that would permit travel into the past, I believe that involves a universe unlike the one we live in. You can certainly construct one on paper however, in which events repeat a given number of times in CTCs.
 
  • #102
JaredJames said:
Is there any reference frame that would permit that?

Take into account quantum effects?
 
  • #103
Loren Booda said:
Take into account quantum effects?

Nothing that fancy, I was just being boring with whatever *space you cared to use in defining coordinates in time. Going back to the light cones and world lines as it were, not a physically realizable bit of excitement.
 
  • #104
Andre said:
I guess not, as it will never be tomorrow. So if you are never there, how can you get back?

So I can start drinking and spending money like there's no tomorrow, because there isn't one?

Yippie! :smile:
 
  • #105
OmCheeto said:
So I can start drinking and spending money like there's no tomorrow, because there isn't one?

Yippie! :smile:

I believe a group of apocalyptic nuts are literally doing that today... probably without the drinking.

Always a bit odd when the world of jokes and fun crosses over with the world of crazy sublimated suicidal urges of a religious mass.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 120 ·
5
Replies
120
Views
39K
Replies
103
Views
16K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
13K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K