Seemingly simple quantum mechanics/linear algebra problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Void123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Quantum
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 2K views
Void123
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For some reason, I am making a trivial mistake somewhere. I just need to find the eigenvalues and normalized eigenvectors of the following matrix:

H = (1/sqrt(2))*Matrix(Row 1 Row 2 Row 3)

Row 1 = [0 -i 0]
Row 2 = [i 3 3]
Row 3 = [0 3 0]

(Sorry, I don't know the proper latex code for a matrix)

If someone can work this out and just provide the solutions so I can compare, I would really appreciate it.





Homework Equations



...



The Attempt at a Solution



I tried.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the normal eigenvalue equation:

[tex] \det(H-\lambda\mathbb{I})=0[/tex]

Solve for [tex]\lambda[/tex] (you should have 3 values since you have a [tex]3\times3[/tex] matrix).

For the eigenvectors,

[tex] \left(\begin{array}{ccc}0&-i&0 \\ i&3&3 \\ 0&3&0\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}x\\y\\z\end{array}\right)=\lambda\left(\begin{array}{c}x\\y\\z\end{array}\right)[/tex]

where you have to do this as many times as you have [tex]\lambda[/tex] values. That should help you a lot

PS: to write matrices in LaTeX, use the command \begin{array} & \end{array}. The following produced the matrix above:

\left(\begin{array}{ccc}0&-i&0 \\ i&3&3 \\ 0&3&0\end{array}\right)
 
Void123 said:
Row 1 = [0 -i 0]
Row 2 = [i 3 3]
Row 3 = [0 3 0]

(Sorry, I don't know the proper latex code for a matrix)

Click on the [itex]\LaTeX[/itex] image below to see the code that generated it

[tex]H=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}0 & -i & 0 \\ i & 3 & 3 \\ 0 & 3 & 0 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

If someone can work this out and just provide the solutions so I can compare, I would really appreciate it.

You've been here long enough to know that isn't what we do here.

I tried.

Then show us!
 
I forgot the [tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[/tex] constant in front of my matrix for the eigenvectors, it should read:


[tex] \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}<br /> \left(\begin{array}{ccc}0&-i&0 \\ i&3&3 \\ 0&3&0\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}x\\y\ \z\end{array}\right)=\lambda\left(\begin{array}{c} x\\y\\z\end{array}\right)<br /> [/tex]
 
Thanks guys.

For my eigenvalues, I got [tex]\lambda = 0, -2, 5[/tex]

For the last two eigenvalues, when I set up the linear equations to solve I get something of the sort [tex]cy = cy[/tex] for one of them. What does that mean for [tex]y[/tex]? When the authors of my textbook do an example like this and run into the same situation, they postulate that [tex]y = 1[/tex]. But how is that when the variable cancels out on both sides?

Thanks again.
 
Void123 said:
Thanks guys.

For my eigenvalues, I got [tex]\lambda = 0, -2, 5[/tex]

Try it again without forgetting the factor of [itex]1/\sqrt{2}[/itex]...:wink:
 
Void123 said:
For the last two eigenvalues, when I set up the linear equations to solve I get something of the sort [tex]cy = cy[/tex] for one of them. What does that mean for [tex]y[/tex]? When the authors of my textbook do an example like this and run into the same situation, they postulate that [tex]y = 1[/tex]. But how is that when the variable cancels out on both sides?

Thanks again.

Doesn't that answer your question? If the authors are allowed to set a canceled variable to be 1, doesn't that mean you can too? Usually you let the canceled variable be 1 for simplicity, but you can make it a billion if you really wanted, it'll just make your later calculations a bit more difficult.

But as Gabba suggested, you should add in that [tex]1/\sqrt{2}[/tex] factor to find your eigenvalues before you turn in your assignment.