Self Inductance of a Coil: Why Not 1/2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaejoon89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coil Inductance
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The self-inductance of a coil decreases by a factor of 1/4 when half of the wire is unwound and re-wound into a coil with the same diameter but half the number of turns. This is due to the relationship between inductance (L), the number of turns (N), and the length of the coil (l). The formula L = (N^2 * μ₀ * A) / l illustrates that reducing the number of turns while maintaining the same length results in a quadratic decrease in inductance. The confusion arises from misinterpreting the relationship between the coil's physical dimensions and the number of turns.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory, specifically self-inductance.
  • Familiarity with the formula for magnetic flux (φ = LI).
  • Knowledge of the relationship between turns, length, and inductance in coils.
  • Basic grasp of the concepts of magnetic fields and solenoids.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the inductance formula L = (N^2 * μ₀ * A) / l.
  • Explore the effects of varying the number of turns on inductance in different coil configurations.
  • Learn about the role of magnetic permeability (μ₀) in inductance calculations.
  • Investigate practical applications of self-inductance in electrical circuits.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of inductance and its applications in coil design and electromagnetic systems.

jaejoon89
Messages
187
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How will a coil's self inductance change if you unwind it and then re-wind half of the length of wire into a coil with the same diameter but with half of the number of turns?

The answer is that it will decrease by 1/4, but I don't understand why it isn't 1/2 instead.

Homework Equations

phi (magnetic flux) = LI (where L is inductance, I is current)
n = N/l where "l" is length
B = mew naught * n * I

The Attempt at a Solution



original: L = phi/I = (NBAcostheta) / I = (N* mew naught *n*I*costheta) / I
Now the L with the proposed change: L' = (N/2)* mew naught * ((N/2) / (l/2))* costheta = 1/2 L
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's because you have confused the length of the solenoid, l, with the length of the wire, 2*pi*R*l, where R is the radius of the coil. The length of the solenoid hasn't changed, only the number of turns per unit length (and the wire's length) have dropped.

Edit:Woopsey, no solenoid mentioned, sorry I've been doing a lot of these and went tunnel vision. Your right the length is halved. Where does your N come from in the NBAcostheta/I?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K