Semi-empirical mass formula and the pairing term

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rwooduk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Mass Term
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the semi-empirical mass formula and the behavior of the pairing term, specifically how it influences the stability of nuclides. It is established that for odd values of mass number A, the pairing term (aP) equals zero, leading to a single parabola with a minimum energy state. In contrast, for even values of A, aP is non-zero, allowing multiple combinations of neutron (N) and proton (Z) numbers that yield the same mass number A. The quadratic nature of the energy equation in Z is confirmed, demonstrating the relationship between the pairing term and the stability of nuclides.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the semi-empirical mass formula
  • Knowledge of nuclear physics concepts, particularly nuclide stability
  • Familiarity with quadratic equations and their graphical representations
  • Basic comprehension of neutron (N) and proton (Z) numbers in atomic structure
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the semi-empirical mass formula in detail, focusing on the pairing term's role
  • Explore the implications of odd and even mass numbers on nuclide stability
  • Learn about the graphical representation of quadratic equations and parabolas
  • Review nuclear physics literature on the relationship between neutron and proton configurations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for nuclear physicists, students studying atomic structure, and anyone interested in the stability of nuclides and the mathematical modeling of atomic mass.

rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59
We have the formula for the mass of an atom:

uNvv565.jpg


From our class notes I have:

By keeping A constant and varying Z there is generally only one stable nuclide for each odd value of A. We can show this by looking at the pairing term to show that odd A gives a single parabola with a single minimum.

Please could someone explain how he manages to get a single parabola from the pairing term? All I understand about the pairing term is that ap<0 for Z,N even, even. ap=0 for A odd and ap>0 for Z,N odd, odd.

At a loss if anyone can help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simple:
If A is odd, then N+Z is odd...
If N+Z is odd then one of them has to be even and the other odd (summing two odds or two evens will give an even number).
So a_P becomes zero and that term misses from the energy...
If A is even then a_P is non-zero... at this case you can have two different Z,N that give the same A which can achieve the least energy...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rolotomassi and rwooduk
ChrisVer said:
Simple:
If A is odd, then N+Z is odd...
If N+Z is odd then one of them has to be even and the other odd (summing two odds or two evens will give an even number).
So a_P becomes zero and that term misses from the energy...
If A is even then a_P is non-zero... at this case you can have two different Z,N that give the same A which can achieve the least energy...

Thanks that's really helpful and clears up the a_p values. I might be being really stupid here but I'll ask anyway, if the a_p term is zero then how is it a parabola? The only thing I can think of is that if the term is missing and you put N=A-Z into the equation you get some sort of quadratic in Z, which would be a parabola?
 
yup, it's the quadratic equation in Z...
you can also check :
http://users.jyu.fi/~ptg/FYSN300/FYSN300_L3.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rwooduk
eg the figure in page 10 and its caption...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rwooduk
awesome, many thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K