Semi-Empirical Mass and E=mc^2 close, but both off? Binding Energy calc

In summary, In calculating the binding energy of 18Na, the semi-empirical answer is 5.919667778950925 MeV, while including the excess mass in the E=mc^2 calculation results in a more accurate answer of 5.919737578950925 MeV.
  • #1
MagneticNeutron
1
2
Homework Statement
Calculate the binding energy of 11-Na-18
Relevant Equations
E = mc^2
Semi-Empirical Mass Formula = SEE CODE BELOW
Hi,

I am calculating the binding energy of 11- Na- 18

Stats:

Table of nuclides has BE/A = 6.202276 ± 0.006249 MeV
m used = 18.026878252 amu

E= mc^2 answer = 5.894327537620224 MeV

Semi Empirical Answer = 5.919667778950925 MeV
Including excess mass in E = mc^2 method

1 - Calculate energy of mass defect

(18.026878252 amu - (11*mP + 7*mN))*(convKilogram) * c^2 => 106.097 MeV

2 - Add in energy of excess mass

106.097 MeV + 25.036931 MeV of excess mass from table

3 - Divide by A

BE/A = 131.134826 MeV / 18 = 7.2852 MeV/A

So I am looking for hints as to why my SEM formula inputs of A = 18 and Z = 11 are coming out so close to an E =m*c^2 calculation that does not include the excess mass, why they are both off by about 0.3 MeV, and why the inclusion of the excess mass in the E = m*c^2 formula comes out way off.I also understand that the SEM formula is a just a model, and that it gets more accurate as the nuclei get larger and heavier. If what I am seeing is simply the error, cool

Code:
Python:
from semiEmpBind import semiEmpBind

massProton = 1.00728;
massNeutron = 1.00867;
lightSpeed = 2.99792458*10**8;
# 11 - Na - 18

massExcess = ((25.036931 * 10**6) / (lightSpeed**2))

massConst = 11*massProton + 7*massNeutron;

massDefect = 18.026878252 - massConst;
massDefect = massDefect * 1.66054*10**-27; #in kg

bindingEnergy = (-1) * massDefect * (lightSpeed)**2;

#in electron Volts

BE = bindingEnergy * 6.242*10**18  / (10**6); #add in mass excess in beginning

perNucleonBE = (25.036931 + BE)/ 18

print("E= mc^2 answer = " , perNucleonBE)semiEmpAns = semiEmpBind(18.0,11.0)/18.0

print("Semi Empirical Answer = " ,  semiEmpAns)

Python:
def semiEmpBind(A, Z):

    N = A-Z; #this is the number of neutrons
    
    aV = 15.76
    aSurf = 17.81
    aC = 0.711
    aA = 23.702
    aP = 11.18
    
    remA = A %2
    remZ = Z%2
    remN = N%2
    
    #determine paring term
    if (remA == 0 and remN == 0 and remZ == 0):
        delNot = 34/(A**0.75)
    elif (remA == 0 and remN == 1 and remZ == 1):
       delNot =  -34/(A**0.75)
    else:
        delNot = 0

    bindEnergy = aV*A - aSurf*(A**(2/3)) - aC*((Z*(Z-1))/(A**(1/3))) - aA*(((A -2*Z)**2)/A) + delNot
    return bindEnergy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Might point out that "excess mass" (binding energy) for an unstable nucleus like 18Na is less per nucleon than stable nuclei like 18O. I don't see a problem with excess mass ~ 0. Try 22Na (well known) as a comparison. 18Na is also near the double proton decay line.
 

FAQ: Semi-Empirical Mass and E=mc^2 close, but both off? Binding Energy calc

1. What is semi-empirical mass and how is it different from E=mc^2?

Semi-empirical mass is a method used to calculate the mass of an atomic nucleus by combining experimental data with theoretical models. It takes into account the mass of individual protons and neutrons, as well as the binding energy of the nucleus. E=mc^2, on the other hand, is a formula that relates the mass of a particle to its energy. It is a fundamental equation in physics that describes the relationship between mass and energy.

2. How is binding energy calculated in the context of semi-empirical mass?

Binding energy is calculated by subtracting the mass of the individual protons and neutrons from the mass of the nucleus. This difference is then multiplied by the speed of light squared (c^2) to convert it into energy. This energy represents the amount of energy required to break apart the nucleus into its individual components.

3. Why are both semi-empirical mass and E=mc^2 off in their calculations?

Both semi-empirical mass and E=mc^2 are theoretical models that are based on certain assumptions and approximations. They do not take into account all factors and variables that may affect the mass and energy of a nucleus, leading to slight discrepancies in their calculations.

4. How do scientists use semi-empirical mass and E=mc^2 in their research?

Scientists use semi-empirical mass and E=mc^2 to understand the structure and behavior of atomic nuclei. These calculations help in predicting the stability of different elements and isotopes, as well as in studying nuclear reactions and processes.

5. Can semi-empirical mass and E=mc^2 be applied to other systems besides atomic nuclei?

While semi-empirical mass and E=mc^2 were originally developed for studying atomic nuclei, they can also be applied to other systems, such as subatomic particles and even large-scale objects like stars. However, the equations and calculations may need to be modified to account for different variables and factors in these systems.

Similar threads

Back
Top