Semi-empirical mass formula and the pairing term

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rwooduk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Mass Term
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 3K views
rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59
We have the formula for the mass of an atom:

uNvv565.jpg


From our class notes I have:

By keeping A constant and varying Z there is generally only one stable nuclide for each odd value of A. We can show this by looking at the pairing term to show that odd A gives a single parabola with a single minimum.

Please could someone explain how he manages to get a single parabola from the pairing term? All I understand about the pairing term is that ap<0 for Z,N even, even. ap=0 for A odd and ap>0 for Z,N odd, odd.

At a loss if anyone can help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simple:
If A is odd, then N+Z is odd...
If N+Z is odd then one of them has to be even and the other odd (summing two odds or two evens will give an even number).
So a_P becomes zero and that term misses from the energy...
If A is even then a_P is non-zero... at this case you can have two different Z,N that give the same A which can achieve the least energy...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rolotomassi and rwooduk
ChrisVer said:
Simple:
If A is odd, then N+Z is odd...
If N+Z is odd then one of them has to be even and the other odd (summing two odds or two evens will give an even number).
So a_P becomes zero and that term misses from the energy...
If A is even then a_P is non-zero... at this case you can have two different Z,N that give the same A which can achieve the least energy...

Thanks that's really helpful and clears up the a_p values. I might be being really stupid here but I'll ask anyway, if the a_p term is zero then how is it a parabola? The only thing I can think of is that if the term is missing and you put N=A-Z into the equation you get some sort of quadratic in Z, which would be a parabola?
 
yup, it's the quadratic equation in Z...
you can also check :
http://users.jyu.fi/~ptg/FYSN300/FYSN300_L3.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rwooduk
awesome, many thanks!