Semi-empirical mass formula and the pairing term

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rwooduk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula Mass Term
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the semi-empirical mass formula, particularly focusing on the pairing term and its implications for stable nuclides. Participants explore how varying the number of protons (Z) while keeping the mass number (A) constant affects the stability of nuclides, especially in relation to odd and even values of A.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that for odd values of A, there is generally only one stable nuclide, suggesting a relationship with the pairing term.
  • Another participant explains that if A is odd, then the sum of N and Z is also odd, leading to the pairing term (a_P) being zero, which affects the energy calculations.
  • It is proposed that when the a_P term is zero, the resulting equation in Z can be interpreted as a quadratic equation, thus forming a parabola.
  • A participant references an external resource to support their explanation regarding the quadratic nature of the equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the relationship between the parity of A and the behavior of the pairing term, but there remains some uncertainty regarding the interpretation of how the absence of the a_P term leads to a parabolic shape in the energy graph.

Contextual Notes

There is an implicit assumption that the pairing term's behavior is understood in the context of the semi-empirical mass formula, but specific mathematical steps and definitions are not fully resolved in the discussion.

rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59
We have the formula for the mass of an atom:

uNvv565.jpg


From our class notes I have:

By keeping A constant and varying Z there is generally only one stable nuclide for each odd value of A. We can show this by looking at the pairing term to show that odd A gives a single parabola with a single minimum.

Please could someone explain how he manages to get a single parabola from the pairing term? All I understand about the pairing term is that ap<0 for Z,N even, even. ap=0 for A odd and ap>0 for Z,N odd, odd.

At a loss if anyone can help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Simple:
If A is odd, then N+Z is odd...
If N+Z is odd then one of them has to be even and the other odd (summing two odds or two evens will give an even number).
So a_P becomes zero and that term misses from the energy...
If A is even then a_P is non-zero... at this case you can have two different Z,N that give the same A which can achieve the least energy...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rolotomassi and rwooduk
ChrisVer said:
Simple:
If A is odd, then N+Z is odd...
If N+Z is odd then one of them has to be even and the other odd (summing two odds or two evens will give an even number).
So a_P becomes zero and that term misses from the energy...
If A is even then a_P is non-zero... at this case you can have two different Z,N that give the same A which can achieve the least energy...

Thanks that's really helpful and clears up the a_p values. I might be being really stupid here but I'll ask anyway, if the a_p term is zero then how is it a parabola? The only thing I can think of is that if the term is missing and you put N=A-Z into the equation you get some sort of quadratic in Z, which would be a parabola?
 
yup, it's the quadratic equation in Z...
you can also check :
http://users.jyu.fi/~ptg/FYSN300/FYSN300_L3.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rwooduk
eg the figure in page 10 and its caption...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rwooduk
awesome, many thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K