Sequence of rationals that converge to irrational

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tonebone10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Irrational Sequence
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding a sequence of rational numbers that converges to the square root of 2 using Newton's Method and continued fractions. Participants highlight the iterative formula derived from Newton's Method: x_n = x_{n-1} - (x_{n-1}^2 - 2)/(2x_{n-1}), which generates rational approximations that converge rapidly to √2. Additionally, the sequence of convergents from the continued fraction representation of √2 is discussed, emphasizing its convergence properties. The consensus is that Newton's Method provides an effective approach for approximating √2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Method for root approximation
  • Familiarity with continued fractions and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of limits and convergence in sequences
  • Proficiency in mathematical notation and iterative sequences
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Newton's Method in numerical analysis
  • Explore the properties and applications of continued fractions in approximating irrational numbers
  • Learn about convergence criteria for sequences and series in calculus
  • Investigate other numerical methods for root finding, such as the Bisection Method and Secant Method
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students in numerical analysis, and anyone interested in the approximation of irrational numbers through rational sequences.

tonebone10
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Find a sequence of rational numbers that converges to the square root of 2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
use Newton's binomial theorem? i.e. (1+1)^(1/2) = 1 + (1/2) + (1/2)(-1/2)(1/2) +

+ (1/2)(-1/2)(-3/2)(1/2)(1/3)+...

this might work.
 
Or another of Newton's tricks:

How do I approximate the positive root of x^2-2?

x_1 = 1

x_2 = x_1 - \frac{x_1^2 - 2}{2x_1}

. \ . \ .

x_n = x_{n-1} - \frac{x_{n-1}^2 - 2}{2x_{n-1}}

. \ . \ .

Obviously each term is rational and \{x_n\} converges to \sqrt{2}.
 
Last edited:
And converges quite quickly, I might add.
 
Do you mean giving a general formula?

If not, take the square root of 2 on a calculator:
1.4142135623730950488016887242097

So a sequence of rationals converging to square root of 2 is:
1, 1.4, 1.41, 1.414, 1.4142, 1.41421, 1.414213, 1.4142135, 1.41421356, etc.
 
the problem here is that a calculator has a bounded number of terms.
 
You could take the sequence of convergents of the continued fraction of sqrt(2).

\sqrt{2}=1+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{2+\ldots}}}
 
I think Data's use of Newton's Method is the best way to display the sequence that converges. Shmoe's definition of the square root of two is correct, but it isn't really written in a form that converges, although I'm sure shmoe could easily do that. I think good old Newton can help you best.
 
Jameson said:
Shmoe's definition of the square root of two is correct, but it isn't really written in a form that converges...

I'm not sure what you mean here. The notation I used is pretty standard, and the sequence of convergents does converge to \sqrt{2}.

Maybe I should have defined what I meant by the convergents. I just mean the sequence begining

1,1+\frac{1}{2}, 1+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{2}}, 1+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{2}}},\ldots

Or do you want some proof that this continued fraction is actually \sqrt{2}?

\sqrt{2}=1+(\sqrt{2}-1)=1+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{2}}

Then repeat:

\sqrt{2}=1+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{2}}}=1+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{2+\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{2}}}},\ldots

In this way you can easily see \sqrt{2} is larger than all the even convergents and smaller than all the odd convergents (calling the first term the 0th). If you believe that they convegre to something (this is pretty standard) then that something has to be \sqrt{2}
 
Last edited:
  • #10
I didn't see the "..." you had included. I just wanted to make sure it was understood that the sequence had to keep going in order to converge. It sounded worse than I meant it. I just liked the way Data wrote the convergence of Newton's Method, with "nth" notation. You are of course very correct with all you said... didn't mean to imply otherwise.
 
  • #11
Oh I see :smile: The ... are quite small, I would have probably missed them if I didn't know I put it there.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K