Sequence operator and transform

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on defining a shift polynomial sequence operator, denoted as S, which is expressed as S=\sum_{i=0}^mc_i\mathbf E^i, where \mathbf E is the shift operator and c_i are constants or functions. The operator S applied to a sequence \{a_n\} results in S(a)_n=\sum_{i=0}^mc_i\mathbf E^ia_n. The challenge presented involves finding a general formula for T^k(a)_n=b_n and its inverse, T^{-k}(b)_n=a_n, for any shift polynomial operator S. Clarifications on the definition of S(a)_n and practical examples are suggested to aid in understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of shift operators in sequence analysis
  • Familiarity with polynomial sequences and their properties
  • Knowledge of inverse operations in mathematical sequences
  • Basic experience with mathematical notation and definitions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of shift operators in sequence transformations
  • Explore examples of polynomial sequences to solidify understanding
  • Study inverse operations in the context of sequence manipulation
  • Examine practical applications of shift polynomial operators in computational mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students in advanced mathematics, and researchers focusing on sequence transformations and polynomial operations will benefit from this discussion.

bqllpd
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Define a shift polynomial sequence operator as
[tex]S=\sum_{i=0}^mc_i\mathbf E^i[/tex]

where [itex]\mathbf E[/itex] is the shift operator and [itex]c_i[/itex] are some constants, variables, functions, etc. When [itex]S[/itex] is applied to a sequence [itex]\{a_n\}[/itex], then [tex]S(a)_n=\sum_{i=0}^mc_i\mathbf E^ia_n[/tex].

If [itex]S[/itex] is composed with itself [itex]k[/itex] times with the sequence, then define
[itex]S^k(a)_n=\left[\sum_{i=0}^mc_i\mathbf E^i\right]^ka_n[/itex].

If the first elements from each new sequence for each [itex]k[/itex] are taken, define this as [itex]S^n(a)_0=b_n=T(a)_n[/itex]. This is a problem I'm having. I know what [itex]T^k(a)_n=b_n[/itex] and [itex]T^{-k}(b)_n=a_n[/itex] are when [itex]m=1[/itex], [itex]c_0=\pm k[/itex] when [itex]c_1=1[/itex] and [itex]c_0=\pm 1[/itex] when [itex]c_1=-1[/itex].

I want to find a general formula for [itex]T^k(a)_n=b_n[/itex] and it's inverse, [itex]T^{-k}(b)_n=a_n[/itex] where [itex]S[/itex] is any shift polynomial operator. Any help would be greatly appreciated.Thanks
bq
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The definition ##S(a)_n := S(a_n)## looks a bit strange, as I would have expected ##S(a)_n = (S(a))_n## because shifts from other positions could end up at position ##n##, whereas you defined it componentwise, i.e. ##S(a)_n## is itself a finite sequence.

Before you go ahead, this has to be clarified. Also a general rule for such equations is always to make some easy examples. E.g. start with ##E(n)=n+1## and ##a_n=\frac{1}{n}## and then write down a few more complicated examples. This should help you to define a precise definition for ##S(a)## as well as ##T##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K