Set Theory Book Reviews: Halmos Edition

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on book recommendations for studying Set Theory, specifically highlighting "Naive Set Theory" by Paul Halmos, which is praised for its clarity despite being terse. Additionally, the Dover edition "Axiomatic Set Theory" by Patrick Suppes is noted for its affordability. Herbert B. Enderton's "Elements of Set Theory" is recommended for its accessible expository style, making it suitable for students with limited mathematical maturity. Enderton's "A Mathematical Introduction to Logic" is acknowledged as challenging, requiring algebraic background, but beneficial for graduate students in mathematics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with basic set theory concepts
  • Understanding of mathematical logic
  • Knowledge of algebraic structures, such as free groups and automorphisms
  • Experience with expository mathematical texts
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore "Naive Set Theory" by Paul Halmos for foundational concepts
  • Read "Axiomatic Set Theory" by Patrick Suppes for a cost-effective alternative
  • Study "Elements of Set Theory" by Herbert B. Enderton for accessible explanations
  • Investigate "A Mathematical Introduction to Logic" by Herbert B. Enderton for advanced logical frameworks
USEFUL FOR

Graduate students in mathematics, undergraduate students in mathematics or related fields, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of set theory and mathematical logic.

Reedeegi
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
I'm looking for a book on Set Theory, currently. I've found one by Halmos which looks good, but I'd like some input on it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Halmos is superb, a little terse but very clear. Also good, and cheaper, is the Dover book by Patrick Suppes, Axiomatic set theory.
 
(1) "Elements of Set Theory" by Herbert B. Enderton
(2) "A Mathematical Introduction to Logic" by Herbert B. Enderton

(1) includes a naive set theory and an introduction of an axiomatic set theory. Enderton's expository style of (1) is accessible to students without having much mathematical maturity. I purchased a used book of (1) from Amazon.com and it has been a good reference for set theory so far.

Even though the title of (2) includes an "introduction", it was not an introductory text for me.
Exercises were challenging and the expository style is very terse in comparison to (1). The book requires some algebraic backgrounds (free group, automorphism, etc) as well.

If you are a graduate student of mathematics, I think the book (2) would be a nice choice for studying mathematical logic. If you are an undergraduate student of mathematics or a graduate student of other areas (physics, computer science, etc), this book would be a bit challenging to you. Anyhow, this book would be still worth reading if you skip some of tough sections and follow the sentential and first order logic part of the book, which is my approach to this book.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
871