Set theory cardinality question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Any infinite set can be expressed as the union of disjoint countable sets, as established by the theorem of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory with the Axiom of Choice (ZFC). The construction involves defining a function f that maps ordinals to disjoint countably infinite subsets of the infinite set X. The process ensures that each subset is countable and that the union of these subsets encompasses the entire set X. This proof relies on the foundational principles of set theory, particularly the properties of countable and uncountable sets.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (ZFC)
  • Familiarity with countable and uncountable sets
  • Knowledge of ordinal numbers and their properties
  • Concept of the Axiom of Choice in set theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Axiom of Choice and its implications in set theory
  • Explore the properties of countable and uncountable sets in detail
  • Learn about ordinal numbers and their role in set construction
  • Investigate the implications of disjoint unions in set theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of set theory, and anyone interested in the foundations of mathematics and the properties of infinite sets.

klabatiba
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Can anyone please give a really explicit proof (omitting no steps) and with as simple words as possible that any infinite set can be writtern as the union of disjoint countable sets?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about something like this:

Every infinite set X has a countable subset (this is a theorem of ZFC). We'll construct a function f from an initial set of ordinals to disjoint countably infinite subsets of X such that X its range. Let f(0) be any countably infinite subset of X = X_0. Then define X_{i+1} = X_i \setminus f(i), X_i = \displaystyle{ \cap_{j<i} X_j} for a limit ordinal i and let f(i) is a countably infinite subset of X_i (the possibility of making these choices collectively relies on the Axiom of Choice). The sequence must eventually end with a null set - otherwise, the set X would be larger than all cardinals.
 
Well, any set is a union of singletons containing exactly one element from the set. A union of all these singletons (which are finite thus countable) gives you that set.
 
I mention only that however the countable sets are constructed, the union must consist of an uncountable number of those sets.

--Elucidus
 
Well, obviously, countable sets cannot be expressed as an uncountable union of disjoint countable sets (assuming by countable you mean countably infinite, or at least non-empty).
 
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K