Set theory. What does this mean?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the notation \(\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\) in set theory and abstract algebra, specifically focusing on its meaning and implications in the context of integers and equivalence relations. Participants explore the concept of integers modulo 2 and the structure of equivalence classes.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that \(\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\) represents the integers modulo 2, explaining that it involves the set of even integers as a substructure.
  • Another participant elaborates on the equivalence relation defined on \(\mathbb{Z}\), indicating that two integers are equivalent if their difference is an even integer, leading to the conclusion that \(\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\) consists of two equivalence classes: the even integers and the odd integers.
  • A general explanation is provided regarding the notation \(A/B\), where \(A\) is a structure and \(B\) is a substructure, emphasizing that the interpretation can vary based on context.
  • Participants note that both previous explanations, despite using different terminology, convey the same underlying concept regarding the structure of \(\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the interpretation of \(\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\) as representing the integers modulo 2 and the equivalence classes involved, though they express this understanding in different ways. No significant disagreements are noted.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the audience's familiarity with abstract algebra and equivalence relations are present, which may affect the clarity of the discussion for those less familiar with these concepts.

omoplata
Messages
327
Reaction score
2
If [itex]\mathbb{Z}[/itex] is the set of integers, what does [itex]\mathbb{Z/2Z}[/itex] mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is the integers modulo 2.

[itex]\mathbb{Z}[/itex] is the set of integers, and [itex]2\mathbb{Z}[/itex] is the set of even integers, and [itex]\mathbb{Z}/\mathbb{2Z}[/itex] is the set of integers modulo the ideal of even integers.

The notation A/B crops up all over the place in many different contexts, so here's a general explanation of roughly what it means:

A is some structure (in this case a ring, but it could be a group, a Lie algebra, a topological space...) and B is some special substructure of A (or in some contexts sometimes an equivalence relation on A). A/B is what you get when you regard the members of B as being equivalent. The exact definition depends somewhat on context. So in this case, we regard all the even integers as equivalent and by extension all the odd integers as equivalent, leaving just two elements in [itex]\mathbb{Z}/(2\mathbb{Z})[/itex]: the set of odd integers and the set of even integers (the equivalence classes).

More generally, we could take the set [itex]\mathbb{Z}/(n\mathbb{Z})=\{[0],[1],\ldots,[n-1]\}[/itex], where the square brackets mean 'equivalence class of', so [itex][k] = \{\ldots, k-2n, k-n,k,k+n,k+2n,\ldots\}[/itex] as the integers modulo n.

Hope that's useful; it's hard to know what level to pitch it at. If you want more details or less jargon I'll be happy to rephrase.
 
Hi omoplata! :smile:

That is actually a notation from abstract algebra. You probably know that [itex]2\mathbb{Z}[/itex] is all the multiples of 2 (thus all even numbers).

Now, on [itex]\mathbb{Z}[/itex], we can put the following equivalence relation:

[itex]x\sim y~\Leftrightarrow~x-y\in 2\mathbb{Z}[/itex]

Then [itex]\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}[/itex] is simply the quotient of this equivalence relation (thus the set of all equivalence classes).

It is easy to see that

[tex]\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}=\{2\mathbb{Z},2\mathbb{Z}+1\}[/tex]

thus the set contains two elements. We can easily put an addition and multiplication on this set and this gives us a field with two elements.

I hope that is clear!
 
I get it now. Thanks a lot.
 
Note that although henry_m and Micromass are using different words, they are saying the same thing!
 
HallsofIvy said:
Note that although henry_m and Micromass are using different words, they are saying the same thing!

Well, yeah. I understood that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K