Sets and Venn Diagrams for Real Numbers: Understanding Associative Axioms

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bergausstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagrams Sets Venn
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the associative axioms for real numbers as they relate to set operations, specifically focusing on the union and intersection of sets. Participants explore how to illustrate these concepts using Venn diagrams and discuss the distributive laws of intersection over union and vice versa. The conversation includes both mathematical reasoning and visual representation of set operations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states the associative axioms for sets, providing the equations for union and intersection.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the task of illustrating these axioms is subjective and may vary in interpretation.
  • Several participants share their attempts at drawing Venn diagrams for both the union and intersection operations.
  • A follow-up question is raised about illustrating the distributive law of intersection over union and vice versa.
  • Participants provide examples using specific sets to demonstrate the equality of expressions involving union and intersection.
  • There is a discussion about the general method of proving set equality by showing mutual inclusion of elements.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about generalizing the proof and seeks assistance from others.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correctness of the Venn diagrams, as some express that interpretations may differ. There is also uncertainty regarding the generalization of proofs, with some participants seeking clarification while others provide their perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the subjective nature of visual representations and the varying levels of understanding among participants regarding the generalization of set operations. The discussion remains open-ended with unresolved mathematical steps and differing interpretations.

bergausstein
Messages
191
Reaction score
0
the associative axioms for the real numbers correspond to the following statements about sets: for any sets A, B, and C, we have $(A\cup B)\cup C=A\cup (B\cup C)$ and $(A\cap B)\cap C=A\cap (B\cap C)$. Illustrate each of these statements using Venn diagrams.

can you show me how to draw the first one with the union of the sets, after that I'll try to illustrate the second statement. just want to get an idea how to go about it.thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The task to "illustrate" is not really mathematical. It basically says, "Draw a picture that you believe would be helpful for grasping associativity of set union". But what people believe to be helpful or relevant may differ.

I would draw it like this.

venn3.png


The idea is that red union is done first and then one adds the blue set. In the end we are interested in the colored region, which is the same in both cases.
 
this is what i tried for the associativity of intersection.

the black circle is A, the red one is B and the blue one is C.

View attachment 1151
 

Attachments

  • venn 2.1.png
    venn 2.1.png
    3.2 KB · Views: 150
Follow up question. can we also illustrate the distributive law of intersection over union? and union over intersection? how would that look like?
 
yes we can.

A = BLACK
B = RED
C = BLUE
for the intersection over union i would illustrate it like this
View attachment 1152

hope this would help you illustrate the other one. :)
 

Attachments

  • Venn2.4.png
    Venn2.4.png
    4.6 KB · Views: 173

Attachments

  • Venn2.5.png
    Venn2.5.png
    3.7 KB · Views: 133
bergausstein said:
this is what i tried for the associativity of intersection.

the black circle is A, the red one is B and the blue one is C.

View attachment 1151
Good job!

- - - Updated - - -

bergausstein said:
here's my try.

View attachment 1154

is this correct?
To me this is okay. But as Evgeny.Makarov pointed out this might not be okay to someone else. Cuz he might say that 'no this does not illustrate the identity correctly' and no one can do anything about it. Don't give it too much importance. Just be sure to understand why $A\cup(B\cap C)=(A\cup B)\cap (A\cup C)$ is true. Can you show this without a diagram?
 
let say $A=\{1,2,3\}$, $B=\{4,5,6\}$, $C=\{6,7,8\}$

$A\cup (B\cap C)=(A\cup B)\cap (A\cup C)$

$\{1,2,3\}\cup \{6\}=\{1,2,3,4,5,6\}\cap \{1,2,3,4,6,7,8\}$
$\{1,2,3,6\}=\{1,2,3,6\}$

but i know there's a more general way to show why that is true. can you show me your work? thanks! I'm weak when it comes to generalizing.
 
bergausstein said:
let say $A=\{1,2,3\}$, $B=\{4,5,6\}$, $C=\{6,7,8\}$

$A\cup (B\cap C)=(A\cup B)\cap (A\cup C)$

$\{1,2,3\}\cup \{6\}=\{1,2,3,4,5,6\}\cap \{1,2,3,4,6,7,8\}$
$\{1,2,3,6\}=\{1,2,3,6\}$

but i know there's a more general way to show why that is true. can you show me your work? thanks! I'm weak when it comes to generalizing.
The general way of showing that $X=Y$ is to show that $X\subseteq Y$ and $Y\subseteq X$.

Here $X=A\cup(B\cap C)$ and $Y=(A\cap B)\cap (A\cup C)$. Let $x\in X$. Can you show that $x$ is in $Y$ too?
 
  • #10
if $X\subseteq Y$ and $Y\subseteq X$ it follows that $X=Y$ and we may conclude that X and Y have precisely the same elements. we can now say that $x\in Y$ given that $x\in X$.
am i right?

and for educational purposes can anybody show me your complete work for proving the statement $A\cup(B\cap C)=(A\cup B)\cap (A\cup C)$

thanks! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K