Shankar Quantum Mechanics, Chapter 5, Page 160-161

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of constraints and parameters in quantum mechanics as presented in Shankar's "Quantum Mechanics," specifically in Chapter 5, pages 160-161. It clarifies that in the context of a finite potential well, there are four constraints due to continuity requirements of the wave function (ψ) and its derivative (ψ') at the boundaries, along with a normalization constraint that effectively reduces the number of free parameters. The normalization condition, $$\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\Psi^* \Psi \, dx = 1$$, is crucial as it determines the overall scale of the wave function, leading to one additional constraint than free parameters.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave functions in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with continuity conditions in mathematical physics
  • Knowledge of normalization in quantum mechanics
  • Basic concepts of potential wells in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of normalization in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the concept of finite potential wells in greater detail
  • Learn about continuity conditions for wave functions and their derivatives
  • Investigate the mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics, focusing on Shankar's approach
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists analyzing wave functions, and educators teaching advanced quantum theory concepts will benefit from this discussion.

DaddyGriffiths
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
So why is it that he says there is 1 more constraint than free parameters instead of 2?
For the case of general potential V(x), what does it mean when he says that there are always one more constraint than free parameters? At each interval, ψ and ψ' must be continuous, so that is 2 constraints at each interval, and I understand that there are 2 parameters of the wavefunction in each interval between the leftmost and rightmost intervals. Getting rid of the rising exponential term at the extremes (x=±∞) so that the wavefunction doesn't blow up, that leaves us with one parameter at each extreme. So why is it that he says there is 1 more constraint than parameters instead of 2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello @DaddyGriffiths ,
:welcome: !​

Can you follow the argument half way on page 160 about finite potential well

A bit of context is also nice, for readers who don't have your book !​
This is about three regions with bounds ##\ -\infty, -L/2, L/2, \infty ## .​
The wave function has an A and a B free parameter in each region.​
Two are required to avoid blowup at ##\ \pm \infty## .​
At ##\ \pm L/2\ ## we require continuity in ##\Psi\ ## and ##\ \Psi'\ ## and that's four constraints.​
So no problem ?​
Not so: there is also the normalization constraint $$\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\Psi^* \Psi \, dx = 1$$ which determines the over-all scale for all parameters simultaneously.​

Shankar said:
It may seem that there are four free parameters ... The over-all scale of ##\ \Psi\ ## is irrelevant in both the eigenvalue equation and the continuity conditions, these being linear in ##\ \Psi\ ## and ##\ \Psi'\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaddyGriffiths and vanhees71
BvU said:
Hello @DaddyGriffiths ,
:welcome: !​

Can you follow the argument half way on page 160 about finite potential well

A bit of context is also nice, for readers who don't have your book !​
This is about three regions with bounds ##\ -\infty, -L/2, L/2, \infty ## .​
The wave function has an A and a B free parameter in each region.​
Two are required to avoid blowup at ##\ \pm \infty## .​
At ##\ \pm L/2\ ## we require continuity in ##\Psi\ ## and ##\ \Psi'\ ## and that's four constraints.​
So no problem ?​
Not so: there is also the normalization constraint $$\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\Psi^* \Psi \, dx = 1$$ which determines the over-all scale for all parameters simultaneously.​
Thank you! Turns out I forgot the normalization constraint and might've initially misinterpreted the part about the continuity constraints (it is actually 2 at each boundary, not 2 in each interval as I initially thought).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K