Question in Principles of Quantum Mechanics by Shankar

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the coefficient a(E) in the context of quantum mechanics as described in "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" by Shankar. Specifically, it addresses the relationship between the incident wave packet ψ_I and the normalized eigenfunction ψ_E of the Hamiltonian, emphasizing the integral a(E) = ⟨ψ_E | ψ_I⟩. The integral's behavior is influenced by the fact that ψ_I is concentrated around k = k_0, leading to orthogonality with negative momentum states, which causes part of the integral to vanish. This analysis is crucial for understanding wave packet behavior in quantum systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts, particularly wave functions and eigenstates.
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian operators and their role in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of momentum space representation and orthogonality in quantum states.
  • Basic proficiency in calculus, particularly integration techniques.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of wave packet evolution in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the role of Hamiltonians in quantum systems, focusing on continuous eigenstates.
  • Explore the implications of orthogonality in momentum space for wave functions.
  • Investigate the mathematical techniques for calculating integrals involving continuous spectra.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying wave packet dynamics and the mathematical foundations of quantum theory. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of the principles outlined in Shankar's text.

wbphysics
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Im studying a book "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" by Shankar.
Im in the fifth chapter, Simple Problems in One dimension.
In page 169 to 170,
the book says about the standard procedure for finding the fate of the incident wave packet.
But i don't understand why we are finding a(E)=<ψ_E/ψ_I> , ψ_E is a normalized eigenfunction of Hamiltonian and ψ_I is an incident wave packet.
More over, in page 170, Step2, Calculating a(E),
it says a part of integral vanishes since, ψ_I in k space is peaked around k=k_0 and is orthogonal to negative momentum states. (k_0=p_0/h bar)
So, please, if you have Shankar's book, help me please~T.T
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wbphysics said:
But i don't understand why we are finding a(E)=<ψ_E/ψ_I> , ψ_E is a normalized eigenfunction of Hamiltonian and ψ_I is an incident wave packet.
For ##{\phi_n}## forming a complete complete basis, we can write and wave function ##\psi## as
$$
\psi = \sum_n a_n \phi_n
$$
where the ##a_n## are complex coefficients given by
$$
a_n = \langle \phi_n | \psi \rangle
$$
In the present case, things are slightly different because the eigenstates are continuous, instead of discrete, but the approach is the same,
$$
\psi_I = \int a(E) \psi_E \, dE
$$
and, just as in the discrete case above, the function ##a(E)##, which plays the role of the coefficients ##a_n## is found using
$$
a(E) = \langle \psi_E | \psi_I \rangle
$$

wbphysics said:
More over, in page 170, Step2, Calculating a(E),
it says a part of integral vanishes since, ψ_I in k space is peaked around k=k_0 and is orthogonal to negative momentum states. (k_0=p_0/h bar)
##\psi_I## is an incident wave packet starting far to the left of the potential step and traveling to the right. Therefore, in its representation in momentum space, the wave function is only non-zero for positive momentum (otherwise, there would be a component moving to the left) and is chosen to be peaked at ##p_0##, which corresponds to the expectation value of its momentum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K