B Shorter half-life and therefore very radioactive -- why?

Click For Summary
Short-lived radionuclides are more radioactive because they emit particles more frequently due to their higher decay constants. The activity of a radionuclide, measured in disintegrations per second, is directly related to its decay constant, which is inversely proportional to its half-life. Therefore, a smaller half-life results in a larger decay constant and consequently higher activity. While intermediate nuclides exhibit higher specific activity, the overall activity remains consistent among isotopes in equilibrium, regardless of their half-lives. Understanding these relationships clarifies why shorter half-lives correlate with increased radioactivity.
CPW
Messages
51
Reaction score
30
TL;DR
In reading through The Physics of Energy, the textbook describes the decay chain of U-238:
"The longest half-life of any descendent in the chain is less 1 million years. Many half-lives are much shorter, making those nuclides very radioactive."

Why does having a short half-life make a radionuclide very radioactive?
In reading through The Physics of Energy, the textbook describes the decay chain of U-238:
"The longest half-life of any descendent in the chain is less 1 million years. Many half-lives are much shorter, making those nuclides very radioactive."
Why does having a short half-life make a radionuclide very radioactive?

My answer, qualitatively:
Relative to the time available for particle emissions from the long-lived parent radionuclide (U-238), the short-lived descendants have much less time to perform all the necessary particle emissions. And therefore, the short-lived radionuclides will have much higher radioactivity, as they will be emitting particles more frequently.
(Am I correct?)

However, quantitatively, I'm stuck.
I'd like a more formal answer than my answer above.

The amount of radioactivity (Bq) must be related to the number of disintegrations per gram per second.
But is there an equation relating these quantities?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The activity (##A##), which is the number of disintegration per unit time, is given by
$$A = \lambda N$$
where ##\lambda## is the decay-constant and ##N## is the number of particles in the sample. If you assume that the number of particles ##N## in the sample does not change significantly during the period of time in which you measure the radioactivity, then you see that the higher the ##\lambda##, the higher the activity (number of disintegrations). It also turns out that the decay-constant ##\lambda## and the half-life ##\tau_{1/2}## are related by:
$$\tau_{1/2} = \frac {\ln 2} {\lambda}$$.
To summarize, small half-life -> big decay-constant ->big number of disintegrations per seconds = high activity.
 
  • Like
Likes artis, Astronuc, Keith_McClary and 2 others
Thank you.
 
  • Like
Likes Keith_McClary, dRic2 and berkeman
I just want to add that the intermediate nuclides are higher radioactive in the sense that the specific activity, i.e. the activity per gram of the nuclide is higher. However, if the decay products are in equilibrium with each other, the activity of all isotopes is the same, irrespective of their half live.
 
Thread 'Some confusion with the Binding Energy graph of atoms'
My question is about the following graph: I keep on reading that fusing atoms up until Fe-56 doesn’t cost energy and only releases binding energy. However, I understood that fusing atoms also require energy to overcome the positive charges of the protons. Where does that energy go after fusion? Does it go into the mass of the newly fused atom, escape as heat or is the released binding energy shown in the graph actually the net energy after subtracting the required fusion energy? I...