The discussion centers on whether attempted murder and murder should carry the same legal charges. Participants argue that the intent to kill is a critical factor, asserting that both planned murder and attempted murder should be treated similarly, regardless of the outcome. The consensus suggests that the severity of punishment should reflect the intent and planning involved, while the actual effect on the victim should also influence sentencing. The distinction between murder and manslaughter is highlighted, particularly in the context of intent and the circumstances surrounding the act.
PREREQUISITESLegal professionals, law students, and individuals interested in criminal justice reform will benefit from this discussion, particularly those examining the nuances of murder charges and the implications of intent in legal proceedings.
pallidin said:In the case of a non-violent assault, the victims reaction must be non-lethal in most, but not all, states.
The over-riding rule, accepted in all courts, is that if the victim reasonably presumes a threat of death or great bodily harm, the victim is allowed any and all measures to stop the attack, including lethal consequence to the attacker.
Indeed.Darken-Sol said:the castle law. texas says i can kill some one on my land for being there w/out my permission.