Should Derivatives Be Taught Before Limits in Calculus?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivatives
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the pedagogical approach to teaching calculus, specifically whether derivatives should be taught before limits. Participants share their experiences and opinions on the sequence of topics in calculus education, considering both theoretical and practical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that limits should be taught before derivatives, as the derivative is fundamentally defined as a limit.
  • Others suggest that understanding derivatives first can be beneficial, especially in certain educational contexts where limits are introduced later.
  • A participant mentions that while limits are important, there are rules (like the power rule and product rule) that can facilitate learning derivatives without a deep understanding of limits initially.
  • One participant notes that different educational institutions may prioritize teaching derivatives and integrals before limits, particularly in engineering-focused curricula.
  • Another participant reflects on their own experience with pre-calculus, indicating that they have not yet covered limits, which influences their approach to learning calculus.
  • There is a discussion about the challenges of understanding limits, particularly when dealing with discontinuities and undefined points, which some participants find complex.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether derivatives should be taught before limits. Multiple competing views are presented, with some advocating for the traditional approach of teaching limits first, while others support a more flexible sequence based on context and student readiness.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about their understanding of limits and derivatives, indicating that their prior knowledge may affect their learning process. There are also references to varying educational backgrounds and curricula that influence perspectives on the topic.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students preparing for calculus, educators considering curriculum design, and individuals interested in different pedagogical approaches to teaching mathematics.

Ivan92
Messages
201
Reaction score
3
Hey there. So during break, I'm going to try and refreshen up what I have learned over the summer on Calculus for next semester. I downloaded the M.I.T video lecture series for Calculus I with David Jerison. The lecture series is good, however I have a question. In his first lecture, he starts off by teaching what a derivative is. Most books and notes I have seen start off with the idea of limits in Calculus. The professor though starts off with derivatives. Even my friend, who has taken Calculus says that one should learn limits then derivatives. What do you guys think? Are there other lectures that I could refer too? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your friend is logical in how he sees the way to approach studying derivatives. The derivative IS a limit. The ratio of two values of a function at two corresponding independent variable values to the difference of those independent variable values as those two values approach zero, is a limit. Studying limits before studying derivatives is justified. What gets difficult and what may be pushed off to the future is the epsilon-delta proofs for limits.
 
Of course limits should be taught(or learned) before derivatives. The derivative, or more generally, the differential is, by definition, a limit. Remember the difference quotient? Although you should consider the possibility of Prof. Jerison expecting his students to learn limits before they come to his class. They are covered in the last unit of my PreCal book.

Although they are important to understand, they are not essential to solving derivatives. There are sets of rules for the transformations of equations that serve the same ends as the difference quotient, but allow you to be much more productive. Some of those rules are: "power rule", "product rule", "chain rule", and "quotient rule". It would serve you well to go into Calc knowing them.

As for learning limits, if you can even watch those lectures without your head hurting, you'll gain a shallow understanding very easily. There are innumerable resources on the internet for teaching limits. themathpage.com has an exceptional article on limits... in it's Calc section. :smile: It is my opinion that it takes longer, even for very intelligent people, to deeply grasp the concept. I'm not sure I'm at that point yet. You'll do great.
 
I've seen courses taught with derivatives, then integrals and finally limits and series are left for the end, as they are thought to be too abstract for starting material (colleges that emphasize engineering and computer science).
As a mathematician, I prefer the courses that teach from the fundamental limits and series approach first, then use theorems to build derivatives and integrals. However, I've seen many people view limits and series with very vague eyes; they may have been taught in the opposite, unnatural way.
 
Ahh...Very well. For my Pre-Cal class, we have not gone over limits. In fact we have not gone over many things that I have learned in my Pre-Cal class in high school. Though he does go over limits, but in the 2nd lecture following the first lecture about the derivative. So far, with what I have seen, it seems pretty easy. Though I do understand that it will get harder. Well, I guess I have to go over limits first then I can start the lecture series. Thanks for the answers. :)
 
So you remember you PreCal stuff? That will help you immensely with the harder limits. If there's nothing weird going on, it's perfectly okay to just plug it in and you're done. But when you have a division by 0, that's were things get slightly more challenging. How about finding the points of discontinuity, remember that? Say you have lim x-> 0 x^2/x, you can tell that there isn't an asymptote, because there's not a constant over an x, and that there is a point of discontinuity at x=0. So to solve it, you cancel out to get x^2/x=x, then plug in 0 for x and you get 0. So you get \lim_{x\to0}x^2/x=0 EDIT again: It SHOULD say =0, but it won't.

A way you can think about it is that, you can get infinitely close to 0, thus, even though it is undefined at 0, the limit is 0.

EDIT: We haven't covered them yet in my HS PreCal, but if the teacher sticks to what he told me earlier, at the end of the year(a few weeks from now) we will get a chance to choose between our last unit being Calc or Stats.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K