Should I graduate in Five years instead of Four?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeremmed77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graduate Years
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the timeline for graduating from a physics program, specifically whether to aim for a four-year or five-year graduation plan. Participants explore the implications of course scheduling, prerequisites, and graduate school requirements.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines their completed coursework and expresses concern about being unable to take advanced physics courses before graduation, which may impact their graduate school applications.
  • Another participant suggests that the original poster (OP) may not be as behind as they think, interpreting their course load as manageable within a four-year timeline.
  • A participant questions the necessity of organic chemistry classes for the OP's physics focus and proposes that the OP should seek permission to enroll in advanced courses concurrently with other classes.
  • Several participants recommend consulting with academic advisers or professors for guidance on course selection and scheduling.
  • One participant shares a negative experience with advisers, suggesting that they may not be supportive of non-traditional paths, while others argue that professors might be more accommodating.
  • Another participant clarifies that at their institution, academic advisers are often professors, which may influence the level of support available to students.
  • It is noted that core physics classes are essential for graduate school applications, and advanced classes may not be strictly necessary.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of certain courses and the effectiveness of academic advisers. There is no consensus on the best approach to course scheduling or the importance of advanced classes for graduate school admission.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the variability in academic advising experiences and the importance of institutional policies regarding course prerequisites and scheduling. There is uncertainty about the specific requirements for graduate school applications.

jeremmed77
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I have already completed all of my liberal education courses except for one during high school (College Classes). Right now I am a freshmen, so I was hoping I could graduate in 2014, but that may not happen. The problem is that all of the physics courses are only offered during either the Fall or the Spring, but never both. That means I am behind a year. For example, I should be taking elect/mag my junior year, but if I graduate in 2014, it will be my senior year. Since I want to go into grad school, I won't be able to take certain courses that would be generally be offered after the electromagnetism course, such as optics/relativity. Could I still get into grad school with the courses listed below, or do I need more advanced ones?

The link to what my university recommends I should take is here: https://webapps-prd.oit.umn.edu/pro...lePlanID=16980&programID=150&programSeq=12562. A sample of what my schedule will be is located below.

Fall 2011: (15)
Calc 2(4)
Phys 1(4)
Astro Course or
Programming Class(4)
Oganic Chem(3)

Spring 2012: (15)
Differential/Linear Alg(4)
Organic Chem 2 (3)
Multivariable Calc(4)
Phys 2 (4)

Fall 2012:
Phys 3 (4 credits)
Math Elective (4 credits)
Thermo/Statistical Phys(3 credits)
Organic Chem Lab (4 credits)

Spring 2013:
Quantum Physics(4)
Quantum Phy Lab(3)
Electives(5-9)

Fall 2013:
Analytical Mechan(4)
Quantum Mech(4)
Stat/Thermal Phy(3)
Experim Phys 1(5)

Spring 2014
Elect/Magn(4)
Experim Phys 2 (5)
Electives(4-6 credits)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I see three years of work there not 4/5. If you go by year 1 = freshman (rather than amount of credits) then I count you taking E&M your junior year and graduating that year.

I don't see your problem, in fact since you have all of your gen ed type courses down you are pretty much ahead by 1-2 years.
 
My mistake. I am in my freshmen year now, and will only have calc 1 finished.
 
Why are you taking organic chemistry classes? Also, what you could possibly do is, for instance, try to talk to professors or someone in the department to letting you into classes like Electromagnetism while you're taking Quantum Mechanics, for the reasons you told us. If you want to take graduate classes, then that would be a good enough reason somewhat, but they might want to have some proof that you know what you're doing and can handle it. If they're not prerequisites, then you ought to just move them to, for instance, Spring 2013 from Spring 2014. You would probably have more luck with this in your math classes, like moving Multivariable calculus to next spring instead of in 2 years, since you could probably do that.
 
Talk to your undergraduate adviser for stuff like this. They're there for a reason.
 
Personally, I've had crappy experience with advisers. They're there to serve the average student, so when you want to do something out of the ordinary, they'll say no or they won't be terribly willing to help you. Some may get this idea that you think you're better than everyone else and that you're trying to beat the system, and that can piss some people off.

I think professors would be more willing to help than advisers, who are trying to cater to everyone and they assume everyone is just an average student, but that's not always the case. They're really there to make sure you don't screw up.
 
hadsed said:
I think professors would be more willing to help than advisers,

At a lot of schools, the advisers are professors. Where I teach, when a student declares a major, s/he has to choose a professor in that department as his/her academic advisor. Incoming students (who haven't yet declared a major) have a professor chosen for them as AA by the college.
 
jtbell said:
At a lot of schools, the advisers are professors. Where I teach, when a student declares a major, s/he has to choose a professor in that department as his/her academic advisor. Incoming students (who haven't yet declared a major) have a professor chosen for them as AA by the college.

where i go, there are two kinds of advisors. there is the departmental advisor who you see about filling out forms and graduate requirements (aka paperwork stuff).

the advisors you go to regarding things like "what classes should i take" etc are professors.

to the OP: you're a freshmen. the core physics classes you need are classical mechanics, e&m, and quantum. probably through in an advance lab and maybe math physics class (if ur school offers it). everything else is gravy.
you seldom NEED advance classes like optics and what not to get into graduate school. the main criteria for who gets into grad school isn't your class list...
 
jtbell said:
At a lot of schools, the advisers are professors. Where I teach, when a student declares a major, s/he has to choose a professor in that department as his/her academic advisor. Incoming students (who haven't yet declared a major) have a professor chosen for them as AA by the college.

Yeah, I forgot to mention this. Of course if this is the case then what I'm saying is irrelevant. Although you can still get stuck with the sort of adviser I was talking about, even in the department. In that case it would be more helpful to talk to someone else.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K