Should I Remove Abandoned Beer Bottles from the Ocean Floor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lisab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Home
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the environmental implications of leaving abandoned beer bottles on the ocean floor, considering their impact on marine life and the ecosystem. Participants explore whether these bottles should be removed or if they serve a beneficial role as artificial reefs.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the beer bottles are encrusted with marine life and questions whether they should be removed, considering their potential role as shelter for organisms.
  • Another participant argues that glass is inert and may support the growth of coralline algae, suggesting that the bottles could be similar to natural reef rocks.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the environmental impact of glass bottles compared to plastic, highlighting that glass may not pose significant issues beyond recycling concerns.
  • A participant shares their experience with a local cleanup, indicating that they would have removed new bottles but recognizes the potential value of older bottles as habitats.
  • Concerns are raised about the dangers of broken glass and the aesthetic impact of litter, though some argue that the bottles may not be worse in the water than on land.
  • One participant recalls a story about the unintended consequences of removing objects that have become habitats, suggesting a hesitation to disturb such environments.
  • Another participant mentions the context of artificial reefs and the idea that some discarded items can contribute positively to marine ecosystems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on whether the beer bottles should be removed or left in place, indicating that there is no consensus on the best course of action. Some see them as potential habitats, while others view them as litter that should be cleaned up.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions about the ecological roles of glass versus plastic in marine environments, as well as the differing impacts of litter on land and in water. The discussion reflects a lack of resolution regarding the environmental implications of leaving or removing the bottles.

lisab
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,050
Reaction score
612
When I was scuba diving last weekend, I noticed several beer bottles on the bottom. They had been there a long time, and were encrusted with barnacles and limpets...and who knows what was living inside.

If I had found a fresh bottle (with nothing living in or on it), I'd have picked it up immediately and cursed the litterbug jerk who tossed it there. I left these in place, since they were colonized. But I'm unsure about my choice. I suppose they pose a small threat of entrapment for something that somehow gets stuck inside. They also might provide shelter, too.

In any case, they aren't part of the natural environment. Should I have removed them?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
i think they'll be fine. glass is pretty inert. coralline algae will grow on it. and everything else. about the only way it differs from real reef rocks is that critters that bore like some bivalves won't be able to secrete acid and bore into it.

but yeah, pretty soon it'll be invisible.
 
This thread was misleading.
 
lisab said:
In any case, they aren't part of the natural environment.
It seems they are ! :smile:
 
I thought the name was perfectly descriptive :biggrin:! Well then how should I have named it?














I know, I know...Jimmy is a fine name.
 
I'd just consider it a very small artificial reef. :approve:

Though I wouldn't suggest people throw beer bottles into the reef (they're still idiots for doing it, IMO), I wouldn't have touched them in those circumstances either.
 
I thought you were talking about my front yard. It's not littered with beer bottles, but broken bits of plastic toys. I hate "Made in China." Quite a different thread.
 
Strange, I correctly guessed what the thread was about from the subject line, things living in trash. Did it used to be something different? Beer bottles strewn about are unsightly, and pose a danger if they shatter, but I don't know the other environmental considerations. They're probably no worse in the water than on land.
 
  • #10
Chi Meson said:
I thought you were talking about my front yard. It's not littered with beer bottles, but broken bits of plastic toys. I hate "Made in China." Quite a different thread.
Perhaps someday you'll meet my daugher, Maiden Japan.
 
  • #11
Just like you said, if they had been new I'd certainly consider them trash and pick them up.

I participated in a local scuba lake clean up last year. We found tons of old pop tops (yeah, the original teardrop ones), that were falling apart. We disposed of them, and nothing was using them as a home, so that thought never crossed my mind.

On the other hand, I live on the Gulf Coast and we have tons of artificial reefs, so I can understand your thoughts about the objects now being a useful. Maybe now when I go diving I'll think twice and chuck my bottles over the side instead of selfishly disposing of them. THANKS LISAB!
 
  • #12
I hate trash and littering. Still, if a beer bottle has become home to some critters on a reef, I would hesitate to disturb it.

Your predicament reminds me of a Patric McManus story about an old-timer who was outraged when some do-gooders hauled an old car out of a stream that had been sheltering some nice big fish, and ruined his favorite fishing hole.
 
  • #13
AFAIK, glass is not really an issue beyond the economics of recylcing it, and the energy involved. I think it's also about context... if someone dumped a case of bottles, I'd clean it... if its one in a constructed reef... that's a home in the making.

Plastic is a different animal altogether, and general detritus which may be consumed. After all, this is why ships are scuttled to make artificial reefs.
 
  • #14
Lisa,

Nice to hear that you care about the environment, I am sure you have heard of http://www.worldculturepictorial.com/blog/content/fimmaker-richard-pain-swim-great-pacific-garbage-patch" .
See thumbnail, I am no tree hugger, but must admit the thought of this gives me pause, as I think it does most reasonable people.

Rhody...:frown: :rolleyes:
 

Attachments

  • trash.jpg
    trash.jpg
    73.3 KB · Views: 466
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #15
rhody said:
Lisa,

Nice to hear that you care about the environment, I am sure you have heard of http://www.worldculturepictorial.com/blog/content/fimmaker-richard-pain-swim-great-pacific-garbage-patch" See thumbnail:

Yes, I have heard of it. In fact, I worked a summer fishing black cod off the Aleutian chain in Alaska, and on remote, uninhabited islands I'd find garbage on the beach - sometimes lots of garbage. Back then (the mid-to-late 80s), most of the garbage was styrofoam cups. This was before bottled water became popular - now most floating garbage is discarded plastic water bottles.

Thanks for that link! In a couple of pics there, there are what look like fishing nets...yikes! Those have to be the worst. They're appropriately called ghost nets:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghost_net

They're dangerous to divers, too.
 
Last edited by a moderator: