Should I Take Physics C? - Math-Oriented Junior's Guide

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision of whether a math-oriented junior should take Physics C, particularly considering their lack of prior physics experience. Participants explore the nature of high school physics, its perceived interest level, and the potential benefits of taking the course.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express that physics is interesting and advocate for taking the course, while noting that high school physics may not cover the most engaging topics.
  • Others argue that the lack of advanced mathematical tools at the high school level limits the depth and excitement of the material presented.
  • A participant suggests that the subjective nature of interest means that what is engaging for one person may not be for another, highlighting the variability in personal engagement with physics.
  • There is a mention of the importance of engaging with the material to find it interesting, implying that personal effort can influence the experience of learning physics.
  • One participant shares a personal anecdote about the captivating nature of modern physics topics like relativity, suggesting that such subjects can be profoundly interesting when presented effectively.
  • Another participant reflects on societal attitudes towards science, indicating that interest in physics may vary widely among individuals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that physics can be interesting, but there is significant disagreement about the quality and depth of high school physics education. The discussion remains unresolved regarding whether taking Physics C is advisable for someone without prior experience.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying opinions on the content and teaching quality of high school physics, suggesting that experiences may differ based on individual schools and instructors. There is also an acknowledgment of the subjective nature of interest in science.

zaboda42
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I have absolutely no physics experience but decided to take Physics C next year as a junior. Is this a good idea? I am a very math-oriented person and the questions that some people as on these forums interest me a lot. So, is physics really interesting? Or should i not take Physics C?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I find Physics very interesting and think that everyone should be at least a little educated in how, to our current understanding, the universe works. I think that you should take the course; however, you should know that you're probably only going to be taught some of classical mechanics, assuming you're in high school.
 
I concur, physics is indeed interesting, however -as lambda has said- assuming you are in high school, you will not see the real interesting side of it.

You should read scientific american and other sources to see the really interesting physics
 
Last edited:
I would even add that most high-school physics is rather dull, simply because one lacks the mathematical tools to do some more interesting stuff. This is not entirely true, you can do fun stuff at high school level, and maybe at some places one does so, but my souvenirs of it are terrible: expansion coefficients of heating a copper bar, buoyancy, pulleys, elementary electrical circuits, ...
In fact, the most interesting stuff you can do at high school level is mathematics. Now, maybe it depends on the school and certainly it depends on the teacher. I think I had a brilliant mathematics teacher, and a mediocre physics teacher.

BTW, I moved this to "academic guidance".
 
The best way to get physics experience is to start by taking a fundamentals of physics course. I have no idea what "physics C" is, but I'm assuming this is a first year university level course.

Whether or not something is "interesting" is a very subjective debate. Some people find rocks interesting. Other people aren't interested unless things are about to explode. As others have said, in a fundamentals course, you will cover a lot of the basics. And as a result, interest will largely come from how much you engage yourself in applying what you learn to external phenomena.
 
"Science is interesting; if you don't agree you can $#&% off" - R.Dawkins
 
I remember in my first class in modern physics where the professor was describing relativity for the first time. No one in the class moved. They were riveted by the absolute strangeness and beauty of what he was describing. Physics interesting? Nothing is more interesting!
 
Alas, there seems to be a big chunk of our society who isn't really interested in see how the world works. I guess you just have to ask yourself if you are interested in learning about how we can describe the world scientifically or more interested in subjective human experience.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K