Should I Try Newtonian Mechanics Again?

  • Thread starter Thread starter andyroo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges of learning Newtonian Mechanics, particularly the struggle with memorizing equations and understanding concepts. The original poster expresses a lack of enjoyment in the subject, attributing it to not engaging with the textbook and preferring a more intuitive approach. Participants emphasize the importance of grasping fundamental concepts over rote memorization, suggesting that understanding the derivation of equations can enhance comprehension. The conversation highlights the necessity of a solid foundation in physics principles to tackle problems effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as force, work, and energy.
  • Familiarity with calculus, particularly single-variable and multi-variable calculus.
  • Knowledge of mathematical derivations and their applications in physics.
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate equations relevant to physical scenarios.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of key physics equations, focusing on concepts like velocity and gravitational forces.
  • Explore resources on Newtonian Mechanics, including textbooks and online courses.
  • Practice solving physics problems that require understanding rather than memorization.
  • Engage with physics simulations or visualizations to reinforce conceptual understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those struggling with Newtonian Mechanics, educators seeking to improve teaching methods, and anyone interested in enhancing their understanding of fundamental physics concepts.

andyroo
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I took a term of Newtonian Mechanics (foundation of physics type of class) and found that I didn't enjoy it very much. I think it was because I never read the textbook and tried to just dive right into problems, I didn't feel attending lecture ever really helped explain things to me, and I also am not the biggest fan of memorizing equations. NOW, that being said, I've finished single-variable calculus and I am taking multi-variable and lin. algebra next fall term. I truly am interested in physics, but it seems like I'm only interested in it when it's on my terms, but I think it might be worth trying physics again.

Opinions? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you were trying to learn physics by memorizing equations, you were doing it wrong.
 
Jack21222 said:
If you were trying to learn physics by memorizing equations, you were doing it wrong.

I don't mean like equations for entire problems. But let's say, whatever the equation for a Joule is...
 
andyroo said:
I don't mean like equations for entire problems. But let's say, whatever the equation for a Joule is...

Forget the "equation" of a Joule, do you know what a Joule is, without looking it up?
 
Meh. I'm leaning towards work
 
Like okay. I understand the differences between forces being acted ON an ojbect and BY an object, I understand work and etc. But here's my problem. Let's say the problem is, "Figure out the velocity of a satellite in orbit around the earth, given variables distance from earth, and et cetera type variables." I'd assume you use gravitational constant to figure out the problem in some way. I just cannot seem to figure out these types of equations though for some reason
 
andyroo said:
Like okay. I understand the differences between forces being acted ON an ojbect and BY an object, I understand work and etc. But here's my problem. Let's say the problem is, "Figure out the velocity of a satellite in orbit around the earth, given variables distance from earth, and et cetera type variables." I'd assume you use gravitational constant to figure out the problem in some way. I just cannot seem to figure out these types of equations though for some reason

You don't really need much memorization to solve something like that, though. If you understand what it all means, it's easy to derive. For instance, with your example:

v = d/t

In a circular orbit, d is given by d = 2\pi r (the circumference of a circle)

\implies v = \frac {2\pi r}{t}

You can derive that from the basic definition of velocity and simple mathematics.
 
You don't really sound like you like physics at all, to be honest.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
9K