Should inaction be considered as an action in any case?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jacky817
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the philosophical and moral implications of inaction, particularly whether it should be considered an action in certain contexts, such as euthanasia and legal scenarios. Participants explore the nuances of inaction in relation to intent, consequences, and moral responsibility.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Philosophical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that inaction can be morally acceptable in specific cases, such as euthanasia, where the intent is not to actively cause death but to allow a natural process to occur.
  • Others suggest that inaction should only be considered an action when it leads to a reaction or consequence, highlighting the complexity of attributing moral responsibility.
  • A participant notes that legal systems often impose penalties for inaction, suggesting that societal views on inaction differ from philosophical perspectives.
  • There is a discussion about the difficulty of achieving true inaction, with one participant suggesting that it may require more effort than action itself.
  • Some argue that conscious choices to remain inactive should be regarded as actions, emphasizing the importance of intent in moral evaluations.
  • Another participant raises the idea that instinctual responses often complicate the consideration of inaction as equivalent to action.
  • One participant references Church law, indicating that there are differing moral and legal frameworks that influence the perception of inaction in specific cases.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on whether inaction should be considered an action, with no consensus reached. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence on context, such as legal versus moral frameworks, and the influence of intent on the evaluation of inaction. There are also references to specific cases that illustrate the complexity of the topic.

Jacky817
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
For cases like euthanasia, in some countries, the moral code is that doctors is not allowed to actively do anything to kill the patients. So they will not feed the patients who are in coma/vegetable state so as to let them starve to death, thus an inaction which is considered morally acceptable.

So should inaction be considered as action in all cases or only in some cases and why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say only inaction that has a reaction. But hopefully someone can expand a little more than I can on this
 
consequences are more easily attributed to inaction where the capacity for some other action would influence the outcome. Likewise, I think you have to distinguish between inaction with intent to allow something else to occur and inaction where no such intent was present. Of course, people who intend for bad things to happen by doing nothing rarely if ever take credit for their inaction; but if the consequences of inaction are positive instead of negative, they will gladly accept the benefits. For example, if your friend told you to sell a particular stock and your computer crashed and the stock went up, you would gladly accept the difference in revenue as your commission; yet if it went down, would you gladly pay the difference or would you say that your computer crashed and so it wasn't your fault and you shouldn't have to pay?
 
emmeighty said:
I would say only inaction that has a reaction. But hopefully someone can expand a little more than I can on this
Insofar as the law is concerned, inaction is considered to have stronger penalties than action. A man witnessing a murder who does nothing is considered to be abetting the criminal and can be tried for second degree murder. From a philosophical standpoint, I would say that inaction requires just as much, if not more effort than action. Lie on the couch all day sometime and try to truly be inactive, you might find it next to impossible. I am not a religious man, but I think this is why sloth is considered a sin. Doing nothing( especially in the face of horrors) is the worst form of apathy. Just look at the holocaust, or Kitty Genovese, when man is inactive, it allows for the active to commit atrocities.
-J
 
Whenever inaction is a conscious choice, it should be considered an action. So in other words to choose not to decide is a choice.
 
When deciding what's the right thing to do, we should consider them equivalent. But deeply rooted instincts often tell us otherwise.
 
Jacky817 said:
For cases like euthanasia, in some countries, the moral code is that doctors is not allowed to actively do anything to kill the patients. So they will not feed the patients who are in coma/vegetable state so as to let them starve to death, thus an inaction which is considered morally acceptable.

So should inaction be considered as action in all cases or only in some cases and why?
According to Church law food and fluids must be given. Check the case of Terry Schievo.
 

Similar threads

News Is the Bush Doctrine Justified or Dangerous?
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Finding support to complete a UK charity registration application
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Linear moving switch, decade counter, chaser
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
Is there such a thing as non-action ?
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
8K
Medical Do statins permanently reduce LDL levels in blood?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
News Should the US intervene in world problems?
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K
Tick-borne diseases - recent increases in cases
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Undergrad Spooky action at a distance not allowed?
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Graduate Post-Selection: Pre-existing Correlations or Action At A Distance?
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
News Should the Gadhimai Animal Sacrifice Festival be Stopped?
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K