Should Incidents in PET Scan Protocol Include a Dimension?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lambda96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gamma pet Quanta
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the appropriate terminology and dimensionality of "incidents" in a PET scan protocol. Participants clarify that while "events" can be considered dimensionless, they can also be expressed in terms of rates such as "events per second" or "events per minute." The confusion arises from the translation of the German term "Ereignis" and the need for clarity in specifying whether to use "Event" or "Events per second." Accurate representation of count rates is essential, as they must be adjusted for duration to reflect proper units like Hz or Bq.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of PET scan protocols and terminology
  • Familiarity with dimensional analysis in scientific reporting
  • Knowledge of unit conversions, particularly in physics
  • Proficiency in both German and English for accurate translation of scientific terms
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the correct usage of "Event" versus "Incident" in scientific contexts
  • Learn about dimensional analysis and its application in experimental protocols
  • Explore the conventions for reporting count rates in nuclear physics
  • Study the translation of scientific terminology between German and English
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and students involved in nuclear medicine, particularly those working with PET scans and protocol documentation.

Lambda96
Messages
233
Reaction score
77
Homework Statement
see Post
Relevant Equations
none
Hi,

I had the PET scan as an experiment a few weeks ago and then had to write a protocol.

The aim of the experiment was to count the number of gamma quanta resulting from pair annihilation. The events were analyzed using the coincidence method. Here is an excerpt from the table including error calculation

Tabelle.png

I received the protocol back today and am supposed to make the appropriate corrections. One comment was that no dimension was specified for the incidents.

The incidents are actually a number and a number doesn't have a dimension, does it?

I don't understand what I should correct there or should I write it like this: incidents [] ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you using an auto-translator? Because "incident" is being used in a way I have never seen it before. You might find a different one is clearer,

Aren't the count rates counts per unit time? i.e. the dimensions will be Hz, (Or Bq) although the numbers in the table will need to be adjusted for duration to make them equal to Hz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lambda96
I have written the protocol in German, but I have translated the table into English for the forum here. We use the term "Ereignis", but I didn't know whether to use event or incident as translation for "Ereignis"

But the unit of an "Ereignis" is dimensionless or not?
 
I think the word you want is "Event". However, you are very unclear whether you want "Event" or "Events per second". They obviously have different units.
 
It is about the unit of events. Unfortunately, I also realise that I have translated the "Zählrate" incorrectly. Each measurement of events was 60 seconds, so the events per second are nothing other than ##\frac{Events}{60s}##

Since events are nothing more than a number, I then have to write "Events [qty]"?
 
I have no idea what you want.
 
What the unit of the events is supposed to be, for me it is unitless but apparently not for my lecturer.
 
And we cannot read your lecturer's mind.

You have been told that you are mixing up "Events" and "Events/second." Which one do you really want? How can we possibly tell you? Which one does your lecturer want? How can we possibly tell you that either?
 
Lambda96 said:
Since events are nothing more than a number, I then have to write "Events [qty]"?
Events/minute. Kind of like Revolutions per Minute (RPM).

1720549489321.png
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
951
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
10K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
8K