Should Incidents in PET Scan Protocol Include a Dimension?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lambda96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gamma pet Quanta
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the proper terminology and dimensionality of "incidents" or "events" in the context of a PET scan protocol. The original poster is seeking clarification on how to represent these terms in their protocol following feedback from their lecturer.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the meaning of "incidents" versus "events" and whether these terms should include a dimension. There is confusion about the appropriate units for counting events and how to express them correctly in the protocol.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the terminology and dimensionality of the terms used in the protocol. Some participants have suggested that "events" may need to be expressed with a unit of time, while others question whether "events" can be considered dimensionless. The discussion reflects a lack of consensus on the correct terminology and representation.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is working from a translated protocol and is trying to reconcile terminology used in German with English equivalents. There is an emphasis on ensuring clarity in communication with the lecturer regarding the expected format.

Lambda96
Messages
233
Reaction score
77
Homework Statement
see Post
Relevant Equations
none
Hi,

I had the PET scan as an experiment a few weeks ago and then had to write a protocol.

The aim of the experiment was to count the number of gamma quanta resulting from pair annihilation. The events were analyzed using the coincidence method. Here is an excerpt from the table including error calculation

Tabelle.png

I received the protocol back today and am supposed to make the appropriate corrections. One comment was that no dimension was specified for the incidents.

The incidents are actually a number and a number doesn't have a dimension, does it?

I don't understand what I should correct there or should I write it like this: incidents [] ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you using an auto-translator? Because "incident" is being used in a way I have never seen it before. You might find a different one is clearer,

Aren't the count rates counts per unit time? i.e. the dimensions will be Hz, (Or Bq) although the numbers in the table will need to be adjusted for duration to make them equal to Hz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lambda96
I have written the protocol in German, but I have translated the table into English for the forum here. We use the term "Ereignis", but I didn't know whether to use event or incident as translation for "Ereignis"

But the unit of an "Ereignis" is dimensionless or not?
 
I think the word you want is "Event". However, you are very unclear whether you want "Event" or "Events per second". They obviously have different units.
 
It is about the unit of events. Unfortunately, I also realise that I have translated the "Zählrate" incorrectly. Each measurement of events was 60 seconds, so the events per second are nothing other than ##\frac{Events}{60s}##

Since events are nothing more than a number, I then have to write "Events [qty]"?
 
I have no idea what you want.
 
What the unit of the events is supposed to be, for me it is unitless but apparently not for my lecturer.
 
And we cannot read your lecturer's mind.

You have been told that you are mixing up "Events" and "Events/second." Which one do you really want? How can we possibly tell you? Which one does your lecturer want? How can we possibly tell you that either?
 
Lambda96 said:
Since events are nothing more than a number, I then have to write "Events [qty]"?
Events/minute. Kind of like Revolutions per Minute (RPM).

1720549489321.png
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
11K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
9K