News Should the electoral college be abolished?

  • Thread starter Thread starter russ_watters
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    College
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the Electoral College should be abolished in favor of a national popular vote for the presidency. Proponents of abolition argue that the current system can lead to a president winning without the majority's support, which undermines democratic legitimacy. Critics defend the Electoral College as a necessary check against populism and the potential for uninformed voting, suggesting it helps balance interests across diverse geographical regions. Some participants propose alternative voting systems, like ranked-choice voting, to ensure broader representation. The conversation highlights deep concerns about political legitimacy and the qualities expected from leaders in a democratic society.

Should the Electoral College be abolished and replaced with a popular vote basis?


  • Total voters
    21
  • #51
Smurf said:
I think it's a great idea. While we're at it we mine as well abolish the rest of the government too. :rolleyes:
That's it? No reason for what you say?


I have...I think they all suck...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
Townsend said:
That's it? No reason for what you say?
It's a matter of convenience really. It'd be really expensive and take a lot of work to rebuild the government system without parties. So let's just not rebuild it at all. Come on, be lazy townsend. You know you want it.

Meanwhile we can spend the money on a new big screen TV for everyone.
 
  • #53
Townsend said:
I agree...the people need to have more than just two options. I wish there was a way to give a third candidate a real chance at taking office.
Perhaps political parties should just be abolished...
What does everyone think of that idea?
I'm thinking about this...interesting thought. I've never thought of it before. I've always argued for more parties. Maybe I like the concept of platforms so as to help clarify what a candidate stands for. The money is a problem. I don't know if anyone remembers Senator DeConcini from Arizona--one of the first to push for limitations on this. I had the pleasure of meeting with him in a small group for about an hour and this was what we discussed -- How to allow more individuals access to public service. This is a sad aspect of our system.
 

Similar threads

Replies
38
Views
7K
Replies
38
Views
6K
Replies
139
Views
16K
Replies
12
Views
14K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
7K
Back
Top