Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Should We Be Stockpiling Helium?

  1. May 31, 2016 #1
    Dear all,
    I have read and heard about helium prices increasing in the future, I was wondering several things. Would it be a good idea to buy and stockpile helium now and keep it for a long time so that I could potentially profit in the future? How do I actually store large amounts of helium cheaply? Will my helium dissipate over time? Is it hard to store helium? Do you think that there will even be a helium crisis? How would I sell helium? Who would buy helium from me? How much would they want to buy? Thank you for your time.

    http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/2015/07/31/helium-policy-prices/
     
    Last edited: May 31, 2016
  2. jcsd
  3. May 31, 2016 #2

    berkeman

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
     
  4. Jun 1, 2016 #3

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I'm going to re-open this and give it a chance...as an engineering thread. Here's how it will go:

    1. Start with today's cost for helium and pick a future cost increase. Just guess - we're not going to get into that prediction.
    2. Decide based on the current and future price how much you want to buy and store.
    3. Research storage methods. For example, can you just buy standard cylinders and stack them in a shed? How many would it take?

    If you approach this with some rigor, you will likely get a useful answer (sneak peek: it isn't feasible for an individual) even if based on speculative pricing.
     
  5. Jun 1, 2016 #4

    fresh_42

    Staff: Mentor

    Wouldn't it simply be enough the look at a chart of helium futures? I've tried to find some but got redirected to unpleasant websites.
    But at its core it seems to me to be a pure economic question about commodities and the price building rules of options.
     
  6. Jun 1, 2016 #5
    So if hypothetically I was going to store large amounts of helium would it have to be stored in liquid form, would that not require refrigeration? Also does helium evaporate through the tanks over time? I do not actually plan on storing helium. I am just curious about it. Also is the link I posted unacceptable?
     
  7. Jun 1, 2016 #6

    anorlunda

    Staff: Mentor

    All fungible commodities could have a futures market, but not all do have a futures market. To build a viable market, you need a minimum number of active traders.
    It is not necessary to store the commodity to have a market. Think of electricity futures for example.

    When I google "helium futures", I get lots of hits on get-rich-quick scams, but checking at the Chicago Board of Trade, I find no helium prices quotes.
     
  8. Jun 1, 2016 #7

    fresh_42

    Staff: Mentor

    I totally agree. However, it does not exclude OTC products. Since there is a demand and therefore a price, there should be forecasts as well, even if the market for options might be too small.
     
  9. Jun 1, 2016 #8

    SteamKing

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I think this is more hype than anything else.

    To answer the top question, the U.S. is already stockpiling helium - and has been since 1925. It's a program called the Federal Helium Program, run by the Bureau of Land Management.

    http://www.blm.gov/nm/st/en/prog/energy/helium_program.html [Broken]

    The helium is stored underground in geological formations, like salt domes.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Helium_Reserve

    Although helium at one time was predicted to run out at some absurdly close date, like 2018, the government is still auctioning off supplies of the gas to commercial buyers. The latest auction occurred just last year, and future auctions are projected to occur through 2021.

    http://www.blm.gov/nm/st/en/prog/energy/helium_program/helium_delivery_2016.html [Broken]

    There are several other sources of the gas worldwide, which is a by-product of natural gas production.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium_production_in_the_United_States
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 7, 2017
  10. Jun 1, 2016 #9

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Yes, if you stored it in liquid form it would require refrigeration. No, tanks don't typically leak by an appreciable amount.
    It's not great, but it is ok. We're just not well equipped to handle the speculative economics type discussion here.

    I did a little research on this: A common cylinder size (K) holds 217 cubic feet of helium at 2200 psi (9" dia, 5' tall, 135lb). At $75/1000 cubic feet, that's $16 worth of helium. So, let's say you wanted to invest $10,000 in helium; you'd need 614 cylinders of it.
     
  11. Jun 1, 2016 #10
    Yeah, that is NOT reasonable at all! Unless there is going to be a tank crisis, which I doubt. Thanks for satiating my curiosity russ_watters!
     
  12. Jun 1, 2016 #11

    SteamKing

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Obviously, when used in industrial quantities, gases like helium are not always furnished in individual bottles.

    If you look at an industrial gas supplier, like Linde, you'll see that they offer several different types of containers for on-site gas storage other than bottles:

    http://www.linde-gas.com/en/products_and_supply/supply_modes/index.html

    The bottles are useful when only a small amount of gas is needed. Storing larger quantities will mean using different methods, including cryogenically as a liquid to save space and reduce container size and storage pressure.
     
  13. Jun 1, 2016 #12

    rbelli1

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Storing it cryogenically will not be economic over any kind of duration. Either you need a large continuous supply of liquid Helium or you need a large supply of energy and a smaller stream of liquid.

    He is not reasonably storable as anything other than a compressed gas at more that a handful of K.

    BoB

    PS: I once saw a 40' cylinder of liquid HE sitting all by it's lonesome at a port. I looked like they were treating it as dangerous goods.
     
  14. Jun 2, 2016 #13

    SteamKing

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    The folks who make cryogenic dewars would tend to disagree with you. You can find standard sizes up to 1000 L and custom sizes to 5000 L. Loss rates as low as 0.5%. DOT approved for shipment on a variety of commercial carriers including aircraft.

    http://www.cryofab.com/products/cmsh_series
     
  15. Jun 2, 2016 #14
    That is because it is a Dangerous Goods. UN1046 , UN 1963
    Under IATA Regs, or ICAO, classified as a non-flammable gas if compressed, or a non-flammable gas /cryogenic liquid if cooled to liquid state and stored in a container that off-gases at a controlled pressure. Maximum container size for the cryogenic case allowed on an aircraft - passenger 50 kg, freight aircraft - 500 kg.

    Other modes of transport can accept larger containers.

    So, yeah, treat it as a Dangerous Goods.
     
  16. Jun 2, 2016 #15

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    That's 0.5% per day. At that rate, in a year (7 month if that is % of full) the OP's investment principal will have all but evaporated.
     
  17. Jun 2, 2016 #16

    SteamKing

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    The thing about trying to make money with commodities is don't get stuck carrying physical inventory of a material which is perishable or subject to wild price fluctuations. Most commodities brokers have the good sense to trade in paper, i.e. futures contracts, where someone else gets to store and deliver the goods to fulfill the contract. You can lose real money trying to rent warehouses and other storage facilities, not to mention arranging for shipment of the goods to their ultimate destination.

    Maybe helium prices can only go up (pun intended), but it seems like there are enough sources of the material available that this is not likely to occur in the near future. The development of new technology made production of oil and gas from less than ideal sources practical, and since helium is a by-product of natural gas production, some additional supplies probably have become available. The U.S. was ready to let its helium reserve and associated infrastructure wither away until recently, but changed policy before this occurred. Most of the U.S. stockpile of helium came from a handful of states, but there are indications that helium could be produced in other regions of the country should the need arise.

    As the OP commented earlier, most of the information you find about helium shortages and whatnot seems to be hyped up to induce the unwary into investing in a commodity where there is a lot of potential downside and not much upside.
     
  18. Jun 2, 2016 #17

    russ_watters

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    That's fine/understood, it just isn't the topic we were discussing.
     
  19. Jun 2, 2016 #18

    CWatters

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I think i read somewhere that the US stockpile made a loss for many years. If they can't make money who can.
     
  20. Jun 4, 2016 #19

    jim hardy

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    For an individual, Common Sense dictates bet against EPA.

    A friend bought a lifetime supply of Freon 22 , about twenty-five of those green 30 lb cylinders, when they cost ~ $20. Now you are required to have an EPA license to handle the stuff and a single 30 lb tank costs several hundred bucks.. "$100 a pound" is the going rate for it in the retail service trade.
    upload_2016-6-4_2-46-15.png

    He'll be able to can keep his whole family in airconditioning for decades and teach his grandkids air-conditioning repair. Sure beats buying them video games..
     
  21. Jun 4, 2016 #20

    SteamKing

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Only as long as older refrigeration equipment is still around which uses R-22. While the manufacture of new supplies of R-22 has been banned in most developed countries which signed the Montreal Protocol, the use of existing equipment and supplies of the gas is permitted under certain circumstances, but the manufacture of R-22 still continues in the developing world because it is a cheap refrigerant.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorodifluoromethane

    In the EU, for example, older refrigeration equipment which still uses R-22 must be replaced with systems capable of using newer refrigerants when the equipment gets broken and needs more than just a recharge of refrigerant to put it back into service.

    It's not like refrigeration has been phased out as a trade. Once, industrial refrigeration used nasty chemicals like ammonia, sulfur dioxide, and methyl chloride to make things cold, but these substances were unsuitable for use in household systems and were replaced by Freon, not that they were much missed after this occurred.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vapor-compression_refrigeration

    Some of the older systems soldiered on for decades using the older refrigerants without incident, but I seem to recall one time where a fire broke out at an old ice house in New Orleans whose system still used either ammonia or sulfur dioxide and was a true relic. The fire fighters had their hands full trying to fight the fire and keep a large spill of the refrigerant from occurring into nearby neighborhoods which could have endangered the residents.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Should We Be Stockpiling Helium?
Loading...