Should you kill an enemy soldier who poses no threat?

  • Thread starter Thread starter motai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pull
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
32 replies · 7K views
Murder by definition is pre-meditated killing of another human being.

personally i couldn't answer the scenario without a lot more information. if i had been ordered to shot any enemy on sight, then not shooting would be disobeying a direct order, grounds for court martial if the stakes were high enough. if i knew so much about him, such as he was a conscript and going home the next day and such, i expect that we then had an insider, and that would create a whole mess of things.. what if that soldier was the insider? what if killing him would put our insider in danger? what if letting him live would endanger the insider? what if he's part of an ambush? the questions go on... but not knowing answers to everything, as a real soldier wouldn't, i'd lean towards not shooting.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that's not the definition of "murder". The definition is the ILLEGAL, premeditated killing of a human being.
 
HallsofIvy said:
No, that's not the definition of "murder". The definition is the ILLEGAL, premeditated killing of a human being.

On that definition, active euthanasia qualifies as murder, even when done at the behest of the person euthanized.