MHB Show Equivalence of AB Parallel to XY | Wondering

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalence
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

We have the triangle ABC. We have that $X\in AC$, $Y\in BC$ and $Z=AY\cap BX$, where $X,Y\neq A,B,C$. I want to show that AB is parallel to XY iff $\frac{|CX|}{|CA|}=\frac{|ZB|}{|ZX|}=1$.

Could you give me a hint what we have to show?

When AB is parallel to XY then we have that then AZB and ZXY are congruent. What do we get from that? (Wondering)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

We have the triangle ABC. We have that $X\in AC$, $Y\in BC$ and $Z=AY\cap BX$, where $X,Y\neq A,B,C$. I want to show that AB is parallel to XY iff $\frac{|CX|}{|CA|}=\frac{|ZB|}{|ZX|}=1$.

Could you give me a hint what we have to show?

Hey mathmari! (Smile)

If we pick BX and AY to be medians, we have $\frac{|CX|}{|CA|}=\frac 12 \ne \frac 21 =\frac{|ZB|}{|ZX|} \ne 1$.
Can it be that $\frac{|CX|}{|CA|} \cdot \frac{|ZB|}{|XZ|}=1$ was intended?

mathmari said:
When AB is parallel to XY then we have that then AZB and ZXY are congruent. What do we get from that?

Aren't $AZB$ and $ZXY$ similar instead of congruent?

Anyway, yes, I believe we should use that if $AB\parallel XY$, that then $AZB$ and $ZXY$ are similar.
That means that the corresponding sides have the same ratio.
Btw, $ABC$ and $XYC$ are also similar. (Thinking)
 
I like Serena said:
If we pick BX and AY to be medians, we have $\frac{|CX|}{|CA|}=\frac 12 \ne \frac 21 =\frac{|ZB|}{|ZX|} \ne 1$.
Can it be that $\frac{|CX|}{|CA|} \cdot \frac{|ZB|}{|XZ|}=1$ was intended?
I don't know. Maybe. The exercise statement is as in #1.
I like Serena said:
Aren't $AZB$ and $ZXY$ similar instead of congruent?

Anyway, yes, I believe we should use that if $AB\parallel XY$, that then $AZB$ and $ZXY$ are similar.
That means that the corresponding sides have the same ratio.
Btw, $ABC$ and $XYC$ are also similar. (Thinking)

From the fact that the triangles $AZB$ and $ZXY$ are similar, we get that $\frac{BZ}{ZX}=\frac{AZ}{ZY}=\frac{AB}{XY}=m_1$.

From the fact that the triangles $ABC$ and $XYC$ are congruent, we get that $\frac{XY}{AB}=\frac{YC}{BC}=\frac{XC}{AC}=m_2$.

Since $m_1=\frac{AB}{XY}$ and $m_a=\frac{XY}{AB} \Rightarrow \frac{AB}{XY}=\frac{1}{m_2}$ we get that $\frac{BZ}{ZX}=\frac{AC}{XC}$, right? (Wondering)

Maybe we have to show the relation without equal to $1$ ? (Wondering)
What about the other direction? (Wondering)

Does the other direction would hold if we would have $\frac{BZ}{ZX}=\frac{AC}{XC}$ without equal to $1$ ? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
Does the other direction would hold if we would have $\frac{BZ}{ZX}=\frac{AC}{XC}$ without equal to $1$ ? (Wondering)

Suppose it holds that $\frac{BZ}{ZX}=\frac{AC}{XC}=:m$.

We consider the triangles $AZB$ and $XZY$. We have that $BZ=m\cdot ZX$ and the angle of $Z$ in both triangles are the same.
We consider the triangles $ABC$ and $XCY$. We have that $AC=m\cdot XC$ and the angle of $C$ in both triangles are the same.

Can we get something from here? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
I don't know. Maybe. The exercise statement is as in #1.

From the fact that the triangles $AZB$ and $ZXY$ are similar, we get that $\frac{BZ}{ZX}=\frac{AZ}{ZY}=\frac{AB}{XY}=m_1$.

From the fact that the triangles $ABC$ and $XYC$ are congruent, we get that $\frac{XY}{AB}=\frac{YC}{BC}=\frac{XC}{AC}=m_2$.

Since $m_1=\frac{AB}{XY}$ and $m_a=\frac{XY}{AB} \Rightarrow \frac{AB}{XY}=\frac{1}{m_2}$ we get that $\frac{BZ}{ZX}=\frac{AC}{XC}$, right?

Yes. (Nod)

mathmari said:
Maybe we have to show the relation without equal to $1$ ?

If so, then we also need to invert one of the fractions.
Either way, the result would be the same as replacing the $=$ sign by a multiplication.
mathmari said:
What about the other direction?

Does the other direction would hold if we would have $\frac{BZ}{ZX}=\frac{AC}{XC}$ without equal to $1$ ?

mathmari said:
Suppose it holds that $\frac{BZ}{ZX}=\frac{AC}{XC}=:m$.

We consider the triangles $AZB$ and $XZY$. We have that $BZ=m\cdot ZX$ and the angle of $Z$ in both triangles are the same.
We consider the triangles $ABC$ and $XCY$. We have that $AC=m\cdot XC$ and the angle of $C$ in both triangles are the same.

Can we get something from here?

I don't see how.

As I see it, either we have to assume that $XY \nparallel AB$ and deduce that the fractions are different.
Or we assume the fractions are the same and deduce that $XY \parallel AB$.
I haven't figured out how to do that yet though.
Perhaps we could do it with vectors instead of geometry properties.
 
For the other direction we have that $\frac{BZ}{ZX}=\frac{AC}{XC}$.

Let $Y'\in BC$ so that $AB\parallel XY'$.
Then $Z'$ is the intersection point of $AY'$ and $BX$.
We have as in the other direction that the triangles $AZB$ and $Z'XY'$ are similar and so it holds that $\frac{BZ'}{Z'X}=\frac{AZ'}{Z'Y'}=\frac{AB}{XY'}$.
The triangles $ABC$ and $XY'C$ are also similar and so it holds that $\frac{XY'}{AB}=\frac{Y'C}{BC}=\frac{XC}{AC}$.
So, we get that $\frac{BZ'}{Z'X}=\frac{AC}{XC}$.
Since $\frac{BZ}{ZX}=\frac{AC}{XC}$, we get that $\frac{BZ'}{Z'X}=\frac{BZ}{ZX}$. Do we conclude from here that $Z'=Z$ and so that $Y'=Y$ ? (Wondering)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top