Dick said:
That can't be the actual problem you were given, is it? With no motivation for solving it? It must mean something, yes?
Yes, there is an actual problem here. This is a small portion of one of the proofs for a theorem in my thesis on electrostatics and potential theory.
Consider a configuration of three equal, positive point charges arranged in an equilateral triangle, with the charges located at [tex](-1,0), (1,0),[/tex] and [tex](0, \sqrt{3})[/tex]. Define the electrostatic potential using the standard Newtonian kernel; that is:
[tex]P(x,y)=\sum_{k=1}^3{\frac{q_k}{\sqrt{(x-x_k)^2+(y-y_k)^2}}}[/tex]
The electrostatic force is given by the gradient of the potential: [tex]F= -\nabla P[/tex]
In particular, the x-component of the force is
[tex]F_x = -\frac{\partial P}{\partial x} = \frac{x}{[x^2+(y-\sqrt{3})^2]^{3/2}}+\frac{x+1}{[(x+1)^2+y^2]^{3/2}}+\frac{x-1}{[(x-1)^2+y^2]^{3/2}}[/tex]
I have already proven that the electrostatic force vanishes at four points: all on the three altitudes of the equilateral triangle. The goal is to prove that there are not more than 4 equilibrium points. Using the three altitudes, you can partition the equilateral triangle into six right triangles, one of which is determined by 0<x<1 and [tex]0<y<-\frac{x}{\sqrt{3}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}[/tex]. The goal is to show that the x-component of the force vectors in this triangle always point to the left... i.e. Fx < 0. If this can be established, then by symmetry I can eliminate any equilibrium points from the other 5 right triangles, leaving me with the four which I have established.
Notice that the first two terms of Fx are positive. I was able to distill them together into the form [tex]\frac{2x+1}{[(x+1)^2+y^2]^{3/2}}[/tex]. What remains is to show that the resulting sum is negative.