Show Lx is Hermitian: Homework Equation Integration

  • Thread starter Thread starter physgirl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hermitian
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In the discussion, the user demonstrates the process of proving that the angular momentum operator Lx is Hermitian in three dimensions. The operator is defined as Lx = (ħ/i)(y ∂/∂z - z ∂/∂y). The user employs integration by parts to show that the integral of f Lx g equals the integral of g Lx* f, confirming the Hermitian property. The conclusion is that Lx, as an essential self-adjoint operator, is Hermitian, aligning with the principles of quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum operators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with integration by parts in multiple dimensions
  • Knowledge of Hermitian operators and their properties
  • Basic concepts of Hilbert spaces and unitary operators
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn advanced integration techniques in multiple dimensions
  • Explore the implications of Stone's theorem in functional analysis
  • Investigate the role of angular momentum in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists working with angular momentum, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of Hermitian operators.

physgirl
Messages
99
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have to show that in 3-d, Lx (angular momentum) is Hermitian.

Homework Equations



In order to be Hermitian: Integral (f Lx g) = Integral (g Lx* f)
Where Lx=(hbar)/i (y d/dz - z d/dy)
and f and g are both well behaved functions: f(x,y,z) and g(x,y,z)

The Attempt at a Solution



I know to do this I have to do integration by parts. I got to the point where I had to figure out, using integration by parts,: Integral [f(x,y,z) y (dg(x,y,z)/dz) dx]

And I cannot figure this out :(

I set:
u=f(x,y,z) y
dv=(dg(x,y,z)/dz) dx

So then I get: du=[df(x,y,z)/dx]y + f(x,y,z)
But what is v then?? Unless I'm completely off-track already, in which case, help would be great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to multiply by dx dy dz, and integrate over all three, not just dx. This should make the integration by parts much easier.
 
As in...

u=f(x,y,z)y
dv=(dg(x,y,z)/dz) dxdydz

So that...

du = (df/dx)y + (df/dx)y + f + (df/dz)y
v=...?

Still not sure :(
 
Focus on the z integral (because the derivative is with respect to z). So du = (df/dz)y.
 
oh, and then v is just g(x,y,z)...
 
Yep!
 
great, thanks!
 
Since L_{x} (or rather its closure in the strong topology of L^{2}(R^3)) generates a uniparametric subgroup of the group of unitary operators which represent a rotation (around an arbitrary axis) in a Hilbert space, then, by Stone's theorem, L_{x} is e.s.a. and its closure is s.a. But all e.s.a. operators are hermitian/symmetric. QED
 
Yeah, that's what I *meant* to say ...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K