Show Roots of Complex Sine Are Real Valued

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the complex sine function, defined as sin(z) = (e^iz - e^-iz) / 2i, has real-valued zeros. Participants explore the equation e^(2iz) - 1 = 0, leading to the conclusion that the roots occur when z = 0. The conversation emphasizes the use of De Moivre's Theorem and the properties of complex exponentials to analyze the sine function's behavior in the complex plane.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their representation
  • Familiarity with the exponential form of trigonometric functions
  • Knowledge of De Moivre's Theorem
  • Basic principles of complex analysis, including the properties of sine and cosine functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of De Moivre's Theorem in complex analysis
  • Learn about the complex logarithm and its multivalued nature
  • Explore the properties of complex sine and cosine functions in detail
  • Investigate the relationship between exponential functions and trigonometric identities in the complex plane
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone studying complex analysis or trigonometric functions in the context of complex numbers.

mancini0
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi guys, I am having difficulty with the following problem:

Show the complex sine function has real valued zeros.

Homework Equations



I know that sin(z) = (e^iz - e^-iz) /2i

The Attempt at a Solution



I have to find roots of sin(z), i.e, when the above equation = 0. First I multiplied both sides by 2i, to cancel the 2i in the denominator.

leaving e^iz -e^-iz = 0.

then e^iz = e^-iz .

So e^iz = 1/e^1z

Now I am stuck. I can break it down to trigonometric form, but I'm not sure how that helps...

cos(z) + i sin(z) = 1 / cos(z) + i sin(z)

I think I have to get the above expression into real and imaginary (u and v) parts:
cos(x+iy) +i (sin(x+iy) = 1/[cos(x+iy) + i*sin(x+iy)]

Any guidance would be much appreciated...

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Factor it. 0=e^(iz)-e^(-iz)=e^(-iz)*(e^(2iz)-1). The first factor is never zero, right?
 
Hmmm... so the roots are when e^(2iz) - 1 = 0, i.e, when e^(2iz) = 1.

e^(2iz) = e^(iz) * e^(iz) = (cos(z) + isin(z) ) * (cos(z) + isin(z))

1= cos^2(z) - sin^2(z) + i(sin(z)cos(z))

Recognizing that cos^2(z) - sin^2(z) = cos(2z), I can rewrite the above as

1 = cos(2z) + isin(z)cos(z)

Now my intuition tells the above must be real valued, since I feel that whatever I put in for z which satisfies the above equation will cancel the imaginary part. I just don't know how to solve the above equation in the complex plane, i.e, how would I expand cos(z) to cos(x+iy)?
 
Isn't there an easier way to solve e2iz=1 by simply taking logarithms?
 
mancini0 said:
Hmmm... so the roots are when e^(2iz) - 1 = 0, i.e, when e^(2iz) = 1.

e^(2iz) = e^(iz) * e^(iz) = (cos(z) + isin(z) ) * (cos(z) + isin(z))

1= cos^2(z) - sin^2(z) + i(sin(z)cos(z))

Recognizing that cos^2(z) - sin^2(z) = cos(2z), I can rewrite the above as

1 = cos(2z) + isin(z)cos(z)

Now my intuition tells the above must be real valued, since I feel that whatever I put in for z which satisfies the above equation will cancel the imaginary part. I just don't know how to solve the above equation in the complex plane, i.e, how would I expand cos(z) to cos(x+iy)?

Work out what e^(2iz) is when z=x+iy. Then set that to 1.
 
micromass said:
Isn't there an easier way to solve e2iz=1 by simply taking logarithms?

If you happen to know log is multivalued and all that stuff. I think a more basic approach might be better here.
 
e^2(iz) = e^2i(x+iy) = e^(2ix -2y)
= e^2ix / e^2y since subtraction in the exponents corresponds to division of base.

The above = 1 when e^2ix = e^2y

i.e, when 2ix = 2y, when ix = y

x = -iy
 
We haven't discussed the complex logarithm, that comes tomorrow! I don't see how my above solution shows sin(z) is always real valued.
 
mancini0 said:
e^2(iz) = e^2i(x+iy) = e^(2ix -2y)
= e^2ix / e^2y since subtraction in the exponents corresponds to division of base.

The above = 1 when e^2ix = e^2y

i.e, when 2ix = 2y, when ix = y

x = -iy

No, no. The complex function e^z isn't one-to-one. You can't cancel it like that. Use deMoivre on e^(2ix). You know a lot about the REAL sine and cosine functions.
 
  • #10
Hmmm, I think it hit me...if x = -iy, then z=x+iy implies z = -iy +iy = 0 is the root.
 
  • #11
mancini0 said:
Hmmm, I think it hit me...if x = -iy, then z=x+iy implies z = -iy +iy = 0 is the root.

See my previous post.
 
  • #12
Okay, thank you very much for your help thus far.

By De Moivre's Theorem I would take the nth power of the modulus and multiply the argument by n.
But why would I do this on e^2ix? I thought De Moivre's theorem only applies when a complex number is raised to an integer?
 
  • #13
\sin(z)=\sin(x)\cosh(y)+i\cos(x)\sinh(y)\,,\ \text{ where }\ z = x + iy

So sin(x)cosh(y) = 0 and cos(x)sinh(y) = 0 .
 
  • #14
mancini0 said:
Okay, thank you very much for your help thus far.

By De Moivre's Theorem I would take the nth power of the modulus and multiply the argument by n.
But why would I do this on e^2ix? I thought De Moivre's theorem only applies when a complex number is raised to an integer?

e^(2ix)=cos(2x)+i*sin(2x). That's all I meant. So 1=(cos(2x)+i*sin(2x))*e^(-2y). First notice that the imaginary part has to vanish. What does that tell you about x? Use that to deduce what y must be.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K