MHB Show Self-Adjointness of Operator E on $L_{2}$ of Square Integrable Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fermat1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Self
Fermat1
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
Conisider the space $L_{2}$ of square integrable functions on R with the usual integral inner product. Show that the operator E defined by, for f in $L_{2}$,
$(Ef)(x)=0.5(f(x)+f(-x)$ is self adoint.

It seems that in order for this to be true we have that f(-x) is the conjugate of f(x) but I don't know why this is true.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, we need to show that $\langle Ef | g \rangle = \langle f | Eg \rangle$ for all $f,g\in L_{2}$. This is tantamount to showing that
$$ \frac{1}{2} \int_{ \mathbb{R}}\left[ f(x)+f(-x) \right]^{*} g(x) \, d\mu
= \frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathbb{R}} f^{*}(x) \left[ g(x)+g(-x) \right] \, d\mu,$$
or
$$ \int_{ \mathbb{R}}\left[ f^{*}(x) g(x)+f^{*}(-x) g(x) \right]\, d\mu
= \int_{\mathbb{R}} \left[f^{*}(x) g(x)+f^{*}(x)g(-x) \right] \, d\mu,$$
or
$$\int_{ \mathbb{R}} f^{*}(-x) g(x)\, d\mu
= \int_{\mathbb{R}} f^{*}(x)g(-x) \, d\mu.$$
Can you think of a way to show this?
 
Ackbach said:
So, we need to show that $\langle Ef | g \rangle = \langle f | Eg \rangle$ for all $f,g\in L_{2}$. This is tantamount to showing that
$$ \frac{1}{2} \int_{ \mathbb{R}}\left[ f(x)+f(-x) \right]^{*} g(x) \, d\mu
= \frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathbb{R}} f^{*}(x) \left[ g(x)+g(-x) \right] \, d\mu,$$
or
$$ \int_{ \mathbb{R}}\left[ f^{*}(x) g(x)+f^{*}(-x) g(x) \right]\, d\mu
= \int_{\mathbb{R}} \left[f^{*}(x) g(x)+f^{*}(x)g(-x) \right] \, d\mu,$$
or
$$\int_{ \mathbb{R}} f^{*}(-x) g(x)\, d\mu
= \int_{\mathbb{R}} f^{*}(x)g(-x) \, d\mu.$$
Can you think of a way to show this?

I had thought of using parts and then using the fact that square integrable functions vanish at + and - infinity but sine there are no derivatives involved that looks to be a non-starter.
 
Fermat said:
I had thought of using parts and then using the fact that square integrable functions vanish at + and - infinity but sine there are no derivatives involved that looks to be a non-starter.

Well, think of the integral (temporarily) as a Riemann integral:
$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f^{*}(x)g(-x) \, dx.$$
What happens when you let $y=-x$?
 
Ackbach said:
Well, think of the integral (temporarily) as a Riemann integral:
$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f^{*}(x)g(-x) \, dx.$$
What happens when you let $y=-x$?

you get the equality.
 
The world of 2\times 2 complex matrices is very colorful. They form a Banach-algebra, they act on spinors, they contain the quaternions, SU(2), su(2), SL(2,\mathbb C), sl(2,\mathbb C). Furthermore, with the determinant as Euclidean or pseudo-Euclidean norm, isu(2) is a 3-dimensional Euclidean space, \mathbb RI\oplus isu(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (1,3), i\mathbb RI\oplus su(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (3,1), SU(2) is the double cover of SO(3), sl(2,\mathbb C) is the...

Similar threads

Back
Top