Show Self-Adjointness of Operator E on $L_{2}$ of Square Integrable Functions

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fermat1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Self
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating the self-adjointness of the operator E defined on the space $L_{2}$ of square integrable functions. Participants explore the necessary conditions and mathematical steps required to show that the inner product $\langle Ef | g \rangle$ equals $\langle f | Eg \rangle$ for all functions in $L_{2}$.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that showing $\langle Ef | g \rangle = \langle f | Eg \rangle$ is essential, leading to a series of integral equalities that must be verified.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the relationship between $f(-x)$ and $f(x)$, questioning why $f(-x)$ would be the conjugate of $f(x)$.
  • Multiple participants propose manipulating the integral expressions to demonstrate the required equality, with one suggesting the use of integration by parts, although they later reconsider its applicability due to the absence of derivatives.
  • A later reply introduces the idea of changing variables in the integral by letting $y = -x$, hinting at a potential simplification that could lead to the desired equality.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to demonstrate the self-adjointness of the operator E. There are competing methods and some uncertainty regarding the properties of the functions involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the need to consider the behavior of square integrable functions at infinity, as well as the implications of treating the integral as a Riemann integral, which may introduce additional assumptions.

Fermat1
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
Conisider the space $L_{2}$ of square integrable functions on R with the usual integral inner product. Show that the operator E defined by, for f in $L_{2}$,
$(Ef)(x)=0.5(f(x)+f(-x)$ is self adoint.

It seems that in order for this to be true we have that f(-x) is the conjugate of f(x) but I don't know why this is true.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, we need to show that $\langle Ef | g \rangle = \langle f | Eg \rangle$ for all $f,g\in L_{2}$. This is tantamount to showing that
$$ \frac{1}{2} \int_{ \mathbb{R}}\left[ f(x)+f(-x) \right]^{*} g(x) \, d\mu
= \frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathbb{R}} f^{*}(x) \left[ g(x)+g(-x) \right] \, d\mu,$$
or
$$ \int_{ \mathbb{R}}\left[ f^{*}(x) g(x)+f^{*}(-x) g(x) \right]\, d\mu
= \int_{\mathbb{R}} \left[f^{*}(x) g(x)+f^{*}(x)g(-x) \right] \, d\mu,$$
or
$$\int_{ \mathbb{R}} f^{*}(-x) g(x)\, d\mu
= \int_{\mathbb{R}} f^{*}(x)g(-x) \, d\mu.$$
Can you think of a way to show this?
 
Ackbach said:
So, we need to show that $\langle Ef | g \rangle = \langle f | Eg \rangle$ for all $f,g\in L_{2}$. This is tantamount to showing that
$$ \frac{1}{2} \int_{ \mathbb{R}}\left[ f(x)+f(-x) \right]^{*} g(x) \, d\mu
= \frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathbb{R}} f^{*}(x) \left[ g(x)+g(-x) \right] \, d\mu,$$
or
$$ \int_{ \mathbb{R}}\left[ f^{*}(x) g(x)+f^{*}(-x) g(x) \right]\, d\mu
= \int_{\mathbb{R}} \left[f^{*}(x) g(x)+f^{*}(x)g(-x) \right] \, d\mu,$$
or
$$\int_{ \mathbb{R}} f^{*}(-x) g(x)\, d\mu
= \int_{\mathbb{R}} f^{*}(x)g(-x) \, d\mu.$$
Can you think of a way to show this?

I had thought of using parts and then using the fact that square integrable functions vanish at + and - infinity but sine there are no derivatives involved that looks to be a non-starter.
 
Fermat said:
I had thought of using parts and then using the fact that square integrable functions vanish at + and - infinity but sine there are no derivatives involved that looks to be a non-starter.

Well, think of the integral (temporarily) as a Riemann integral:
$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f^{*}(x)g(-x) \, dx.$$
What happens when you let $y=-x$?
 
Ackbach said:
Well, think of the integral (temporarily) as a Riemann integral:
$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f^{*}(x)g(-x) \, dx.$$
What happens when you let $y=-x$?

you get the equality.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K