Show that 2^(k-1) doesn't divide n(n-1)/2

  • Thread starter Thread starter _Andreas
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves showing that \(2^{k-1}\) does not divide \(\frac{n(n-1)}{2}\) given that \(2^{k-1}\) divides \(n\) while \(2^k\) does not. The context is rooted in number theory, particularly in divisibility and properties of even and odd integers.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of \(n\) being expressed as \(n=2^{k-1}m\) and question the nature of \(m\) in relation to divisibility by 2. There is discussion about whether \(m\) being odd affects the overall divisibility of \(\frac{n(n-1)}{2}\) by \(2^{k-1}\).

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the assumptions regarding the values of \(k\) and the implications of \(m\) being odd. Some have pointed out that if \(k=1\), it leads to trivial divisibility, which complicates the argument. The discussion is ongoing with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the conditions under which \(k\) is defined, particularly the distinction between \(k \geq 1\) and \(k > 1\), as well as the implications of these conditions on the nature of divisibility in the problem.

_Andreas
Messages
141
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



[tex]2^{k-1}[/tex] divides n, while [tex]2^k[/tex] does not. Show that [tex]2^{k-1}[/tex] does not divide [tex]\frac{n(n-1)}{2}[/tex].

The Attempt at a Solution



That [tex]2^{k-1}[/tex] divides n implies that [tex]n=2^{k-1}m[/tex], where m is an integer.

[tex]\frac{n}{2^k}=\frac{m}{2}[/tex], which implies that [tex]2[/tex] does not divide m, which in turn implies that [tex]k\geq 1[/tex].

[tex]\frac{\frac{n(n-1)}{2}}{2^{k-1}}=\frac{m}{2}(n-1)[/tex]

However, the last expression seems like it could still be an integer, given the premises above. Am I missing something?

(Intermediate steps are not shown because I've recalculated them several times and found them to be correct. I'm pretty sure there must be something else that's wrong or missing.)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
you've already shown that m is not divisible by 2; so how could (m/2)(n-1) be an integer?
 
[tex]\frac {\frac {n(n-1)} {2}}{2^{k-1}} = \frac {n(n-1)} {2^k}[/tex]

n is even.
 
Of course, m is an odd integer if it isn't divisible by 2, so if n is even I have shown what I'm supposed to show. But how can n be even if [tex]k\geq 1[/tex]?
 
n=2^(k-1)m which is an integer, m multiplied by some (positive integer) power of 2...hence n must be even
 
gabbagabbahey said:
n=2^(k-1)m which is an integer, m multiplied by some (positive integer) power of 2...hence n must be even

But if k=1 I then have 2^0*m=m.
 
Your condition should be that k>1...k≠1 because k=1 implies that you are counting k^0=1 as a non-trivial divisor of n.
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Your condition should be that k>1...k≠1 because k=1 implies that you are counting k^0=1 as a non-trivial divisor of n.

Why does it imply that?
 
Because if k=1, 2^(k-1)=2^0=1...which is a trivial divisor (every integer is divisible by 1), so your non-trivial cases are k>1 not k≥1.
 
  • #10
Yes, 1 is a trivial divisor, but why is it that k=1 implies that I'm counting 1 as a non-trivial divisor?
 
  • #11
Because one of the premises of your proof is that n is divisible by 2^(k-1); but if k=1, then that premise is trivial.

Considering that you are trying to show that n(n-1)/2 is not divisible by 2^(k-1); it seems reasonable that you assume that the problem refers to a non-trivial 2^(k-1).
 
  • #12
Aaah, I get it now! Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K