Show that any composite three-digit number must have a prime factor

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Composite Prime
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Any composite three-digit number must have a prime factor less than or equal to 31. The proof utilizes contradiction, assuming a composite number has prime factors greater than 31, leading to the conclusion that such a number exceeds 999, which is impossible. The lemma stating that the largest prime factor of any composite positive integer N is less than or equal to √N is crucial for this proof. This lemma should be established before the proof to enhance clarity and rigor.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of composite numbers and prime factors
  • Familiarity with proof by contradiction
  • Knowledge of basic number theory concepts, including square roots
  • Ability to formulate and prove mathematical lemmas
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of prime factors in composite numbers
  • Learn how to construct and prove mathematical lemmas
  • Explore proof techniques in number theory, particularly proof by contradiction
  • Investigate the relationship between prime factors and the square root of integers
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying number theory, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of composite numbers and prime factorization.

Math100
Messages
817
Reaction score
230
Homework Statement
Show that any composite three-digit number must have a prime factor less than or equal to ## 31 ##.
Relevant Equations
None.
Proof:

Suppose for the sake of contradiction that any composite three-digit number
must have a prime factor not less than or equal to ## 31 ##.
Let ## n ## be any composite three-digit number such that ## n=ab ## for
some ## a,b\in\mathbb{Z} ## where ## a,b>1 ##.
Note that the smallest prime factor greater than ## 31 ## is ## 37 ##.
Then we have ## a,b\geq 37 ##.
Thus ## n=ab\geq (37)^2=1369 ##.
This is a contradiction because ## 1369 ## is not a composite three-digit number.
Therefore, any composite three-digit number must have a prime factor less than or equal to ## 31 ##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Math100 said:
Then we have ## a,b\geq 37 ##.
Better would be "##max(a, b) \ge 37##"
The largest three-digit number is 999. ##\sqrt{999} \approx 31.61##, so if ##n = ab## is a three-digit composite number that is smaller than 999, the larger of its prime factors must be less than or equal to 31.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math100
I omitted the fact that for any composite, positive integer N, the largest prime factor must be less than or equal to ##\sqrt N##. You might want to prove that as a lemma that supports the problem you're working on.
 
Mark44 said:
I omitted the fact that for any composite, positive integer N, the largest prime factor must be less than or equal to ##\sqrt N##. You might want to prove that as a lemma that supports the problem you're working on.
Do I need to change my proof to another method? Or is proof by contradiction okay?
 
I don't see anything wrong with your proof, except that it less direct than it could be.
 
Mark44 said:
I don't see anything wrong with your proof, except that it less direct than it could be.
About where should I insert the lemma which you've mentioned?
 
Math100 said:
About where should I insert the lemma which you've mentioned?
A lemma should come before a proof that refers to it.
 
Lemma: For any composite positive integer ## N ##,
the largest prime factor must be less than or equal to ## \sqrt{N} ##.

Proof:

Note that the largest composite three-digit number is ## 999 ##.
Thus ## \sqrt{N}=\sqrt{999}\approx 31.61 ##.
Therefore, any composite three-digit number must have a prime factor
less than or equal to ## 31 ##.
 
But you should provide a proof of the lemma...
 
  • #10
Math100 said:
Homework Statement:: Show that any composite three-digit number must have a prime factor less than or equal to ## 31 ##.
Relevant Equations:: None.

Proof:

Suppose for the sake of contradiction that any composite three-digit number
must have a prime factor not less than or equal to ## 31 ##.
This is not the negation of the original proposition. The negation should be:

There exists a composite three-digit number with no primes factors less than or equal to 31.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math100

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K