Show that n+2 is not a perfect square

  • Thread starter Thread starter opt!kal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Square
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving that if n is a perfect square, then n+2 cannot be a perfect square, using a proof by contradiction. The participants establish that if n = k² and n+2 = p², then the equation (p - k)(p + k) = 2 must hold. They conclude that the only integer factors of 2 lead to contradictions when solving for k and p, confirming that n+2 cannot be a perfect square.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of perfect squares and their properties
  • Familiarity with proof by contradiction techniques
  • Basic algebraic manipulation, including factoring
  • Knowledge of integer properties and factorization
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of perfect squares in number theory
  • Learn more about proof techniques, particularly proof by contradiction
  • Explore the concept of integer factorization and its applications
  • Investigate related problems involving differences of squares
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in number theory and proof techniques will benefit from this discussion.

opt!kal
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I've been having a lot of trouble with this particular proof lately, and I just do not know how to finish it up:

Homework Statement



Show that if n is a perfect square, then n+2 is not a perfect square.(show by contradiction)

Homework Equations



none that I know of

The Attempt at a Solution



Since its a proof by contradiction, I know that I can rewrite it in the form: p ^ not q.

So I have: n is a perfect square, and n+2 is a perfect square.

Since I assume that then I have that n = k^2 and n+2 = p^2

So then I'll have (k^2) + 2 = p^2

At this point I basically get confused. I just have no idea on how to proceed from here, my only guess is that I should do two cases, one where k is even and one where k is odd, and show for each case that p^2 will end up like the case, while p will end up as the opposite (i.e. if I do the even case, then try to show that p will end up odd). But I have absolutely no idea on how to accomplish that. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
-3^2 = 9
-2^2 = 4
-1^2 = 1
0^2 = 0
1^2 = 1
2^2 = 4
3^2 = 9
4^2 = 16
And so on.

Regardless of what integer you're squaring, no two perfect squares are a distance of 2 apart. It is 1, 3, 5, 7, etc.
 
Goldenwind said:
-3^2 = 9
-2^2 = 4
-1^2 = 1
0^2 = 0
1^2 = 1
2^2 = 4
3^2 = 9
4^2 = 16
And so on.

Regardless of what integer you're squaring, no two perfect squares are a distance of 2 apart. It is 1, 3, 5, 7, etc.
But how would you prove that statement?
 
opt!kal said:
Hi there,

I've been having a lot of trouble with this particular proof lately, and I just do not know how to finish it up:

Homework Statement



Show that if n is a perfect square, then n+2 is not a perfect square.(show by contradiction)


Homework Equations



none that I know of

The Attempt at a Solution



Since its a proof by contradiction, I know that I can rewrite it in the form: p ^ not q.

So I have: n is a perfect square, and n+2 is a perfect square.

Since I assume that then I have that n = k^2 and n+2 = p^2

So then I'll have (k^2) + 2 = p^2

At this point I basically get confused. I just have no idea on how to proceed from here, my only guess is that I should do two cases, one where k is even and one where k is odd, and show for each case that p^2 will end up like the case, while p will end up as the opposite (i.e. if I do the even case, then try to show that p will end up odd). But I have absolutely no idea on how to accomplish that. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

You almost have it. Saying that k2+ 2= p2 is the same as saying p2- k2= 2. Since the left side is the difference of two squares, that is the same as (p- k)(p+k)= 2. That is, p-k and p+k are integer factors of 2. But 2 only has 1, -1, 2, and -2 as integer factors. Can you finish it from there?
 
Yeah I think I see what you're saying. So basically for (k + p)(k - p) = 2 to hold, k and p can only be -2, 2, -1, 1. However, plugging each one in, you see that they will not equal to 2, so that means that the assumption that n + 2 is a perfect square does not hold? Does that seem right? Thanks in advance!
 
No, p and k do not need to be -2, 2, -1, or 1. Only p+k and p-k need to be -2, 2, -1, 1.
 
opt!kal said:
Yeah I think I see what you're saying. So basically for (k + p)(k - p) = 2 to hold, k and p can only be -2, 2, -1, 1. However, plugging each one in, you see that they will not equal to 2, so that means that the assumption that n + 2 is a perfect square does not hold? Does that seem right? Thanks in advance!

Tedjn said:
No, p and k do not need to be -2, 2, -1, or 1. Only p+k and p-k need to be -2, 2, -1, 1.
Exactly. And since k and p are positive integers, what can they be if p+ k and p- k are -2, 2, -1, or 1?
 
Hrmmm, I think I see what's you're trying to say... So I set p + k = 2 and p - k = 1 and solve right? then do p + k = 1 and p - k = 2...and do the same thing for the negative cases, and solve for p and k, which I don't think will end up as integers...and since an integer a is a perfect square if there is an integer b such that a = b^2, a contradiction occurs? (sorry for the late reply, just got bogged down by other work) Thanks in advance!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K