Show That the Curve is Straight

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Euge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a mathematical problem involving a continuously differentiable curve between two fixed points in Euclidean space. The goal is to prove that this curve lies on the straight line connecting the two points, given that its arclength equals the Euclidean distance between them.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant clarifies the relationship between the curve's endpoints and its arclength, stating that the arclength can be expressed as an integral involving the derivative of the curve.
  • Another participant suggests that the parameters a and b can be set to specific values (0 and 1) without loss of generality to simplify the problem.
  • There is a mention that the straight line represents the shortest path between the two points, implying that the challenge is to prove the curve must conform to this straight line.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the definitions of parameters and the implications of the curve's properties. No consensus is reached on the approach to proving the statement.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the definitions of the parameters a and b, as well as the implications of the curve's arclength in relation to its shape.

Euge
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
2,072
Reaction score
245
Fix points ##p,q\in \mathbb{R}^n##, and let ##\gamma : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R}^n## be a continuously differentiable curve from ##p## to ##q## whose arclength equals the Euclidean distance between the points, ##|q - p|##. Prove that ##\gamma## lies on the straight line passing through ##p## and ##q##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ahmed1029 and topsquark
Physics news on Phys.org
It’s just a question on reading the problem, what do a and b mean?
 
Last edited:
So the starting point is <br /> \|\gamma(b) - \gamma(a)\| = \int_a^b \|\gamma&#039;(t)\|\,dt if \gamma(a) = p and \gamma(b) = q, and we want to conclude that <br /> \gamma(t) = p + \gamma&#039;(a)G(t) for some G: [a,b] \to \mathbb{R} with \gamma&#039;(a) = K(q - p) for some K \in \mathbb{R}, G(a) = 0, and G(b) = K^{-1}.

I think that without loss of generality we can take a = 0 and b = 1.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak
Suppose there exists t_0 \in (0,1) such that r= \gamma(t_0) is not on the straight line from p to q, Then \begin{split}<br /> \int_a^b \|\gamma&#039;(t)\|\,dt &amp;= \int_a^{t_0} \|\gamma&#039;(t)\|\,dt + \int_{t_0}^b \|\gamma&#039;(t)\|\,dt \\<br /> &amp;\geq \|r - p\| + \|q - r\| \\<br /> &amp;&gt; \|q - p\| \end{split} since the straight line path gives the shortest possible path between p and q. But this a contradiction, so each point of \gamma lies on the straight line.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak
since the straight line path gives the shortest possible path between p and q

I believe the actual point of the challenge is to prove this is true.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K