Why Is There No d → s + Z^0 Interaction in the Standard Model?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Poirot
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the nonexistence of the d → s + Z^0 interaction within the Standard Model of particle physics. This conclusion is supported by experimental results and the standard model Lagrangian, which reflects observed measurements. The transformation of quark states using the Cabibbo angle is also mentioned, indicating that both d and s quarks are suppressed in this interaction. The topic is relevant for students studying particle physics at the undergraduate level.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of weak interactions in particle physics
  • Familiarity with the Standard Model Lagrangian
  • Knowledge of quark mixing and the Cabibbo angle
  • Basic concepts of particle decay processes
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Standard Model Lagrangian on particle interactions
  • Explore the role of the Cabibbo angle in quark mixing
  • Investigate experimental results related to weak interactions
  • Learn about tree-level interactions in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

Students in undergraduate physics programs, particularly those focusing on particle physics, as well as researchers interested in the Standard Model and weak interactions.

Poirot
Messages
87
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Consider weak interactions of quarks involving the Z0 bosons. Show that there is no d → s + Z0 interaction in the Standard Model.

Homework Equations


(d') = (cosθ sinθ) (d)
(s') (-sinθ cosθ) (s)
This is the change of variables matrix.
θ is the Cabibbo angle, with the rotation matrix on the down and strange quark

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure how to prove this, I think it may be something to do with that there is a sinθ x both d and s if you're doing the transformation so they're both suppressed? But that's a wild guess, my knowledge isn't that deep on this matter.
Thank for any help, much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which course is this?

The nonexistence of this interaction (at tree-level) is an experimental result. Sure, you can look at equations and point out that it does not happen according to them (the standard model Lagrangian is probably the best point), but those equations were made to reflect our measurements, so that's kind of recursive reasoning.
 
mfb said:
Which course is this?

The nonexistence of this interaction (at tree-level) is an experimental result. Sure, you can look at equations and point out that it does not happen according to them (the standard model Lagrangian is probably the best point), but those equations were made to reflect our measurements, so that's kind of recursive reasoning.
It's a particle physics module in a 2nd year physics degree, I had the exam today and it went as well as it could have done, so thank you for all your help, with this and with other questions, it's greatly appreciated!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K