Showing a probability is of order (Dt)^2

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DinkyDoe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving that the probability of transitions from state C to state O and back to state C within the time interval [0, Δt] is of order (Δt)^2. The transitions are modeled using exponential random variables T^+ and T^- with rates λ+ and λ-, respectively. The integral formulation for this probability involves a triple integral over the density functions of T^+ and T^- and confirms that the probability is indeed O(Δt^2) through a Taylor expansion of the cumulative distribution function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponential distributions and their properties
  • Familiarity with probability density functions
  • Knowledge of calculus, particularly integration and Taylor series
  • Basic concepts of stochastic processes and state transitions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the convolution of probability distributions, particularly for independent random variables
  • Learn about the properties of exponential distributions and their applications in modeling transitions
  • Explore Taylor series expansions and their use in approximating functions
  • Investigate applications of Bayes' theorem in probability calculations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, and researchers in fields involving stochastic processes, particularly those interested in transition probabilities and their applications in various scientific domains.

DinkyDoe
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hoi. I want to prove the following:

Suppose we want to calculate the probability that we have transitions $C\to O\to C$
in the time interval $[0,\Delta t]$ where $C,O$ stand for different states. (we start in state $C$) And we have $T^+ \sim \exp(\lambda _+)$ and $T^- \sim \exp(\lambda_-)$ where $T^+$ is the time between a transition from $C\to O$, and $T^-$ the time between a transition $O\to C$. I want to show that the probability is of order $(\Delta t)^2$. So we need not know the probability explicitly. But suppose we try to do this explicity...

So i guess we need a triple integral for this...if we want to do this explicitly, we want to integrate over all $0<s_1<s_2\leq \Delta t$ so that

$P(T^+\leq s_1)$,
$P(T^-\leq s_2-s_1)$,
$P(T^+>\Delta t-s_1-s_2)$ (since we want after $C\to O \to C$ that it doesn't flip back to state $O$ within $[0,\Delta t]$)

And we simply assume independence...so I guess we can multiply the density functions
and make some triple integral with the correct boundaries. But I'm really confusing myself with this...

using the probability densities we must get some integral $\int\int\int ... ds_1ds_2dy$

Can someone see through my confusion, and point me in the right direction? I guess I'm not such a big calculus-star.

Thanks :)

---------- Post added at 01:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:39 PM ----------

Could it be that this is the correct integral? $\int_0^{\Delta t}p_+(s_1)\left(\int_{s_1}^{\Delta t}p_-(s_2)\left(\int _{\Delta t-s_1-s_2}^{\infty}p_+(x)dx\right)ds_2\right)ds_1$

---------- Post added at 02:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:50 PM ----------

DinkyDoe said:
Hoi. I want to prove the following:

Suppose we want to calculate the probability that we have transitions $C\to O\to C$
in the time interval $[0,\Delta t]$ where $C,O$ stand for different states. (we start in state $C$) And we have $T^+ \sim \exp(\lambda _+)$ and $T^- \sim \exp(\lambda_-)$ where $T^+$ is the time between a transition from $C\to O$, and $T^-$ the time between a transition $O\to C$. I want to show that the probability is of order $(\Delta t)^2$. So we need not know the probability explicitly. But suppose we try to do this explicity...

So i guess we need a triple integral for this...if we want to do this explicitly, we want to integrate over all $0<s_1<s_2\leq \Delta t$ so that

$T^+\leq s_1$,
$T^-\leq s_2-s_1$,
$T^+>\Delta t-s_1-s_2$ (since we want after $C\to O \to C$ that it doesn't flip back to state $O$ within $[0,\Delta t]$)

And we simply assume independence...so I guess we can multiply the density functions
and make some triple integral with the correct boundaries. But I'm really confusing myself with this...

using the probability densities we must get some integral $\int\int\int ... ds_1ds_2dy$

Can someone see through my confusion, and point me in the right direction? I guess I'm not such a big calculus-star.

Thanks :)

---------- Post added at 01:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:39 PM ----------

Could it be that this is the correct integral? $\int_0^{\Delta t}p_+(s_1)\left(\int_{s_1}^{\Delta t}p_-(s_2)\left(\int _{\Delta t-s_1-s_2}^{\infty}p_+(x)dx\right)ds_2\right)ds_1$

edit 2: sorry...think i solved it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DinkyDoe said:
Hoi. I want to prove the following:

Suppose we want to calculate the probability that we have transitions $C\to O\to C$
in the time interval $[0,\Delta t]$ where $C,O$ stand for different states. (we start in state $C$) And we have $T^+ \sim \exp(\lambda _+)$ and $T^- \sim \exp(\lambda_-)$ where $T^+$ is the time between a transition from $C\to O$, and $T^-$ the time between a transition $O\to C$. I want to show that the probability is of order $(\Delta t)^2$. So we need not know the probability explicitly. But suppose we try to do this explicity...

So i guess we need a triple integral for this...if we want to do this explicitly, we want to integrate over all $0<s_1<s_2\leq \Delta t$ so that

$P(T^+\leq s_1)$,
$P(T^-\leq s_2-s_1)$,
$P(T^+>\Delta t-s_1-s_2)$ (since we want after $C\to O \to C$ that it doesn't flip back to state $O$ within $[0,\Delta t]$)

And we simply assume independence...so I guess we can multiply the density functions
and make some triple integral with the correct boundaries. But I'm really confusing myself with this...

using the probability densities we must get some integral $\int\int\int ... ds_1ds_2dy$

Can someone see through my confusion, and point me in the right direction? I guess I'm not such a big calculus-star.

Thanks :)

---------- Post added at 01:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:39 PM ----------

Could it be that this is the correct integral? $\int_0^{\Delta t}p_+(s_1)\left(\int_{s_1}^{\Delta t}p_-(s_2)\left(\int _{\Delta t-s_1-s_2}^{\infty}p_+(x)dx\right)ds_2\right)ds_1$

---------- Post added at 02:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:50 PM ----------



edit 2: sorry...think i solved it
It is very simple you are asking for the asymtotic form (as \( \Delta t \to 0\) ) of the cumulative distribution \( F_{T^++T^-}(\Delta t) \), where we know the density:

\[f_{T^++T^-}(z)=\int_0^z \lambda_+e^{-\lambda_+(z-y)} \lambda_-e^{-\lambda_-y}dy\]

Both the required integrals are elementary, then a power series expansion of \( F_{T^++T^-}(\Delta t) \) about \( \Delta t=0\) and you are done.

That is; the key idea here is that the density of the sum of two independent random variables is the convolution of their individual densities.

Now if you want that the probability that there is no further transition in the interval it does become a bit more complicated .. but an application of Bayes' theorem should do it.

CB
 
Last edited:
CaptainBlack said:
It is very simple you are asking for the asymtotic form (as \( \Delta t \to 0\) ) of the cumulative distribution \( F_{T^++T^-}(\Delta t) \), where we know the density:

\[f_{T^++T^-}(z)=\int_0^z \lambda_+e^{-\lambda_+(z-y)} \lambda_-e^{-\lambda_-y}dy\]

Both the required integrals are elementary, then a power series expansion of \( F_{T^++T^-}(\Delta t) \) about \( \Delta t=0\) and you are done.

That is; the key idea here is that the density of the sum of two independent random variables is the convolution of their individual densities.

Now if you want that the probability that there is no further transition in the interval it does become a bit more complicated .. but an application of Bayes' theorem should do it.

CB
Thank you. Sounds cool, then you're actually using more advanced stuff. I did it in a more elementary way...I think I solved it correctly. I worked it out in Latex:

So we want to calculate the probability that we have transitions $C\to O \to C$ within the time-interval $[0,\Delta t]$. Here we denote by $T^+$ the time between transition $C\to O$, and $T^-$ the time between transition $O\to C$, where $T^+\sim \exp(\lambda _+)$ and $T^-\sim \exp(\lambda_-)$ . Denote by $p^+(x)$ and $p^-(x)$ the corresponding density functions. Observe that we want to intgrate over all possible $0<s_1<s_2\leq \Delta t$ such that $T^+\leq s_1$, $T^-\leq s_2-s_1$, and $T^+>\Delta t-s_1-s_2$ since we don't want to flip back $C\to O$ after $C\to O\to C$ within the time-interval $[0,\Delta t]$. This leads to the following integral $$ \int_0^{\Delta t}p_+(s_1)\left(\int_{s_1}^{\Delta t}p_-(s_2)\left(\int _{\Delta t-s_1-s_2}^{\infty}p_+(x)dx\right)ds_2\right)ds_1$$
Calculating the integral gives us $$\left(\frac{\lambda_-}{\lambda_+-\lambda_-}\right)\left( \left(\frac{1}{\lambda_+}\right)\left(e^{(\lambda_+-\lambda_-)\Delta t}-e^{-\lambda_-\Delta t}\right)+\left(\frac{1}{2\lambda_+-\lambda_-}\right)\left(e^{-\lambda_+\Delta t}-e^{(\lambda_+-\lambda_-)\Delta t}\right)\right)$$Using the taylor expansion of $e^x$, we show that the above expression equals $O(\Delta t^2)$. That is, we show that in its Taylor expansion, the coefficients of $\Delta t^0$ and $\Delta t$ are zero, and the coefficient of $\Delta t^2$ is unequal to zero. We can forget the factor $\frac{\lambda_-}{\lambda_+-\lambda_-}$. The case $\Delta t^0$ is obvious. We check that the coefficient of $\Delta t $ equals zero. Namely, observe that $$\left(\frac{1}{\lambda_+}\right)\left(\left(\lambda_+-\lambda_-\right)\Delta t+\lambda_-\Delta t\right)+ \left(\frac{1}{2\lambda_+-\lambda_-}\right)\left(-\lambda_+\Delta t+(\lambda_+-\lambda_-)\Delta t\right) = \Delta t-\Delta t =0$$
After another straightforward verification, we find that the coefficient of $\Delta t^2$ equals $\frac{\lambda-}{2}\neq 0$. Therefore, for small intervals $[0,\Delta t]$ the probability of the event $[C\to O\to C]$ is $O(\Delta t^2)$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K