Showing that a subset is a group

  • Thread starter Thread starter erogard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
erogard
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Consider a finite, additive and abelian group [tex]G[/tex] of order [tex]mn[/tex], where [tex]gcd(m,n)=1[/tex]. Basically m an n are relatively prime.

Now we define [tex]G_{m} =[/tex] { [tex]g \in G |[/tex] order(g) divides m }.

I'm trying to show that [tex]G_{m}[/tex] is a subgroup of G. All I really need to show is that it is closed under addition. That is, [tex]g_{1}, g_{2} \in G \Rightarrow g_{1} + g_{2} \in G[/tex].

So I let [tex]k_{1}[/tex] and [tex]k_{2}[/tex] be the order of g1 and g2, respectively, and try to express the order of (g1 + g2) in terms of k1 & k2, and, moreover, to show that order (g1+g2) divides m.

I know that k1k2 does the job, that is, k1k2(g1 + g2) = e, but k1k2 may not divide m since we might end up with k1k2 > m.

I've tried a lot of different things, so far unsuccessfully, but any ideas or suggestions would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dick said:
How about lcm(k1,k2) (least common multiple). That works doesn't it? It's certainly less than m.

Thanks, that certainly does it - I'm just trying to convince myself that it is less than m.
 
erogard said:
Thanks, that certainly does it - I'm just trying to convince myself that it is less than m.

Then yourself is hard to convince. m IS a common multiple of k1 and k2.
 
Dick said:
Then yourself is hard to convince. m IS a common multiple of k1 and k2.

haha, right, I think I've been a bit slow thinking last night. Thanks for your help.