Showing that a_n > 0 given its decreasing and lim a_n=0

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    decreasing
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a sequence \( a_n \) is non-negative given that it is decreasing and converges to zero, specifically \( \lim_{n\to\infty} a_n = 0 \) and \( a_{n+1} \le a_n \) for all \( n \). The participants agree that if \( a_n < 0 \) for any \( n \), the sequence would not remain within any \( \epsilon \)-neighborhood of zero, contradicting the limit condition. A formal proof structure is suggested, starting by assuming \( a_n < 0 \) and demonstrating that all subsequent terms would be at least a distance \( |a_n| \) from zero, thus invalidating the limit assertion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus, specifically \( \lim_{n\to\infty} \)
  • Familiarity with sequences and their properties, particularly monotonic sequences
  • Knowledge of epsilon-delta definitions of limits
  • Basic proof techniques, including proof by contradiction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of monotonic sequences in real analysis
  • Learn about epsilon-delta definitions and their applications in proofs
  • Explore proof techniques, particularly proof by contradiction and direct proof methods
  • Investigate convergence criteria for sequences and series in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematicians focusing on real analysis, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of sequences and limits.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
I'm reading a proof, and it says that since ##\lim_{n\to\infty}a_n = 0## and ##a_{n+1}\le a_n## for all ##n##, it must be the case that ##a_n \ge 0##.

This seems very obvious, since if ##a_n < 0## for some ##n## then it would decreasing from then on, so there wouldn't be infinitely many elements contained in every ##\epsilon##-neighborhood around ##0##. But is this sufficient for proof? What would a write up of a "proof" of this simple statement look like?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assume the opposite. Then there's some ##a_n<0##. Then show that every subsequent member of the series is at least distance ##|a_n|## from 0. So 0 can't be the limit.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K