I Showing that operators follow SU(2) algebra

Click For Summary
To verify that the raising and lowering operators for two quantum oscillators follow the SU(2) algebra, one should express the operators T_1 and T_2 in terms of T_- and T_+. The SU(2) commutation relation is defined as [T_1, T_2] = i ε^ijk T_3. The discussion emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between the SU(2) group and its corresponding algebra, denoted as \mathfrak{su}(2). The provided basis transformations link the operators to the Pauli matrices, which can aid in the verification process. Understanding these relationships is crucial for confirming the algebraic structure.
graviton_10
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
For two quantum oscillators, I have raising and lowering operators
gif.gif
and
gif.gif
, and the number operator
gif.gif
. I need to check if operators below follow
gif.gif
commutation relations.

gif.gif


gif.gif


Now as far as I know, SU(2) algebra commutation relation is [T_1, T_2] = i ε^ijk T_3. So, should I just get T_1 and T_2 in terms of T_- and T_+ and then try to check if I get they follow the SU(2) commutation relation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just a pedantic comment but ##SU(2)## is a group, and ##\mathfrak{su}(2)## is an algebra.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby and DrClaude
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...