Showing this Euler's equation with a homogeneous function via the chain rule

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on demonstrating that a general homogeneous function, defined as a C^1 function with the property f(tx, ty) = t^k f(x, y), satisfies Euler's equation: x∂f/∂x(x, y) + y∂f/∂y(x, y) = k·f(x, y). Participants emphasize the importance of applying the chain rule correctly, particularly when differentiating f(tx, ty) with respect to t. The final conclusion is that the equality must hold for any value of t, specifically when t=1, leading to the required Euler equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of homogeneous functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in multivariable calculus
  • Knowledge of partial derivatives and their notation
  • Basic concepts of differentiating functions with respect to parameters
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about the properties of homogeneous functions in depth
  • Explore examples of Euler's homogeneous function theorem
  • Practice differentiating functions with respect to multiple variables
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on calculus and differential equations, as well as anyone interested in the applications of homogeneous functions in mathematical analysis.

lo2
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Ok I have this general homogeneous function, which is a C^1 function:

f(tx,ty)=t^k f(x,y)

And then I have to show that this function satisfies this Euler equation:

x\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x,y)+y\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(x,y)=k\cdot f(x,y)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so I have tried to take the derivative, and I get:

x(1\cdot t+1\cdot 0) + y(1\cdot 0+1\cdot t)=xt+yt

But that does not really do the trick, so am I on the right way? And if so what more should I do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Differentiate f(tx, ty) with respect to t
 
clamtrox said:
Differentiate f(tx, ty) with respect to t

But I have this equation:

x\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x,y)+y\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(x,y)=k\cdot f(x,y)

Where I have to differentiate first with regards to x and then y. So am I not sure I can see how I should just differentiate with regards to t.
 
lo2 said:
But I have this equation:

x\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x,y)+y\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(x,y)=k\cdot f(x,y)

Where I have to differentiate first with regards to x and then y. So am I not sure I can see how I should just differentiate with regards to t.

It's a straightforward application of the chain rule... ∂f(tx,ty)/∂t = ∂f(tx,ty)/∂(tx) ∂(tx)/∂t + ∂f(tx,ty)/∂(ty) ∂(ty)/∂t ...

After you got that, then differentiate the other side, tk f(x,y) and then consider what happens when t→1.
 
clamtrox said:
It's a straightforward application of the chain rule... ∂f(tx,ty)/∂t = ∂f(tx,ty)/∂(tx) ∂(tx)/∂t + ∂f(tx,ty)/∂(ty) ∂(ty)/∂t ...

After you got that, then differentiate the other side, tk f(x,y) and then consider what happens when t→1.

Ok so I get this when I differentiate f(xt,yt):

\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}(xt,yt) = 1\cdot x + 1\cdot y = x + y

But I am not sure how to differentiate:

t^k f(x,y)

Shall I once again differentiate with regards to t?
 
lo2 said:
Ok so I get this when I differentiate f(xt,yt):

\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}(xt,yt) = 1\cdot x + 1\cdot y = x + y

That is not right. Can you understand the formula in my previous post? That tells you how it goes.

lo2 said:
But I am not sure how to differentiate:

t^k f(x,y)

Shall I once again differentiate with regards to t?

Yes... The point is to keep the equality
f(tx, ty) = tk f(x,y), therefore
∂f(tx, ty)/ ∂t = ∂/∂t (tk f(x,y))
 
clamtrox said:
That is not right. Can you understand the formula in my previous post? That tells you how it goes.

Well I guess not, I am not sure what this differentiates up to be:

\frac{\partial f}{\partial tx}(tx,ty)

The other one I think I got correct?

\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}(tx) = x
 
I do not want to seem rude.

But might someone else perhaps chip in with a little bit of help?

Would be most appreciated! :)
 
lo2 said:
Well I guess not, I am not sure what this differentiates up to be:

\frac{\partial f}{\partial tx}(tx,ty)

Yeah I guess that looks a little tricky. If you want, you can also write it as \frac{\partial f(a,b)}{\partial a} evaluated at a=tx.
 
  • #10
clamtrox said:
Yeah I guess that looks a little tricky. If you want, you can also write it as \frac{\partial f(a,b)}{\partial a} evaluated at a=tx.

Well I must admit that I am still not sure how to compute that.

As you do not know what the function is, and thereby I find it hard differentiate...
 
  • #11
Ok I think I have got something:

If we first differentiate

f(tx,ty)

We get:

x\frac{\partial f}{\partial xt}(xt,yt)+y\frac{\partial f}{\partial yt}(xt,yt)

And since this has to be equal to

k\cdot f(x,y)

We have that

t^k

Can only be a constant when t=1, so if we do that we get:

\frac{df}{dt}=x\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x,y)+y\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(x,y)=1^k f(x,y)=k\cdot f(x,y)
 
  • #12
Ok well I kind of have to go soon, so if you would please have a short glance at my suggested solution, I would be more than happy!
 
  • #13
I couldn't quite follow that last post. Are we sure you are not assuming there what you have to prove?

I may have a mental blockage; am not sure that you can or are meant to prove 2 from 1.

The only 'homogeneous functions' I know are homogeneous polynomials which are things of form

f(x, y) = Ʃ arxryk-r (r from 0 to k)

Get the two derivatives of that and you'll see it's easy.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
epenguin said:
I couldn't quite follow that last post. Are we sure you are not assuming there what you have to prove?

I may have a mental blockage; am not sure that you can or are meant to prove 2 from 1.

The only 'homogeneous functions' I know are homogeneous polynomials which are things of form

f(x, y) = Ʃ arxryk-r (r from 0 to k)

Get the two derivatives of that and you'll see it's easy.


Ok well I am not exactly sure what you mean here, but if you are asking what it is I need to show then it is:

I have this general homogeneous function, which is a C^1 function:

f(tx,ty)=t^k f(x,y)

And then I have to show that this function satisfies this Euler equation:

x\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x,y)+y\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}(x,y)=k\cdot f(x,y)
 
  • #15
lo2 said:
We get:

x\frac{\partial f}{\partial xt}(xt,yt)+y\frac{\partial f}{\partial yt}(xt,yt)
Good!

lo2 said:
And since this has to be equal to

k\cdot f(x,y)

No! :) It has to be equal to k tk-1 f(x,y). This has to hold for any value of t, and in particular for t=1, which is the case you're interested in.
 
  • #16
Ah yeah ok, thanks a lot for the help! :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K