Showing $XF_{X}+YF_{Y}+ZF_{Z}=nF$ with a Homogeneous Polynomial

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the identity $XF_{X}+YF_{Y}+ZF_{Z}=nF$ for a homogeneous polynomial $F(X,Y,Z) \in \mathbb{C}[X,Y,Z]$ of degree $n$. This identity is a specific case of Leibniz's identity, which can be demonstrated through the polynomial representation $F=\sum_{j=0}^{k}\lambda_{j}X^{e_{x,j}}Y^{e_{y,j}}Z^{e_{z,j}}$ where $e_{x,j}+e_{y,j}+e_{z,j}=n$. The proof involves computing the partial derivatives $F_{X}$, $F_{Y}$, and $F_{Z}$, confirming that the equality holds for any homogeneous polynomial over any field $K$, provided that $n$ is not a divisor of the characteristic of the field, $ch(K)$. This relationship is also recognized as Euler's formula.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of homogeneous polynomials
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives
  • Knowledge of Leibniz's identity
  • Basic concepts of field theory, particularly characteristics of fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of Leibniz's identity in detail
  • Explore the applications of Euler's formula in various mathematical contexts
  • Learn about the characteristics of fields and their implications in polynomial equations
  • Investigate the generalizations of homogeneous polynomials in multiple variables
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying algebra, and anyone interested in advanced polynomial theory and its applications in various fields of mathematics.

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hi! (Smile)

Let $F(X,Y,Z) \in \mathbb{C}[X,Y,Z]$ a homogeneous polynomial of degree $n$. Could you give me a hint how we could show the following? (Thinking)

$$XF_{X}+YF_{Y}+ZF_{Z}=nF$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi evinda,

This is a particular case of Leibniz's identity.

Call $F=\displaystyle\sum_{j=0}^{k}\lambda_{j}X^{e_{x,j}}Y^{e_{y,j}}Z^{e_{z,j}}$ where $e_{x,j}+e_{y,j}+e_{z,j}=n$ for all $j$.

Then $F_{X}=\displaystyle\sum_{j=0, \ e_{x,j}\geq 1}^{k}e_{x,j}\lambda_{j}X^{e_{x,j}-1}Y^{e_{y,j}}Z^{e_{z,j}}$

And so for $Y, Z$, now it's just a computation.

Actually, in this way you can prove that this kind of equality holds for every homogeneus polynomial (no matter how many variables) over any field $K$ while $n$ is not a divisor of $ch(K)$
 
Fallen Angel said:
Hi evinda,

This is a particular case of Leibniz's identity.

Call $F=\displaystyle\sum_{j=0}^{k}\lambda_{j}X^{e_{x,j}}Y^{e_{y,j}}Z^{e_{z,j}}$ where $e_{x,j}+e_{y,j}+e_{z,j}=n$ for all $j$.

Then $F_{X}=\displaystyle\sum_{j=0, \ e_{x,j}\geq 1}^{k}e_{x,j}\lambda_{j}X^{e_{x,j}-1}Y^{e_{y,j}}Z^{e_{z,j}}$

And so for $Y, Z$, now it's just a computation.

Actually, in this way you can prove that this kind of equality holds for every homogeneus polynomial (no matter how many variables) over any field $K$ while $n$ is not a divisor of $ch(K)$

This is the original exercise:

If $F(x,y,z) \in \mathbb{C}[x,y,z]$ is a homogeneous polynomial of degree $n$, prove the Euler's formula.

$$XF_X+YF_Y+ZF_Z=nF$$

Is the last equality Euler's formula? (Thinking)
 
Fallen Angel said:
Hi evinda,

This is a particular case of Leibniz's identity.

Call $F=\displaystyle\sum_{j=0}^{k}\lambda_{j}X^{e_{x,j}}Y^{e_{y,j}}Z^{e_{z,j}}$ where $e_{x,j}+e_{y,j}+e_{z,j}=n$ for all $j$.

Then $F_{X}=\displaystyle\sum_{j=0, \ e_{x,j}\geq 1}^{k}e_{x,j}\lambda_{j}X^{e_{x,j}-1}Y^{e_{y,j}}Z^{e_{z,j}}$

And so for $Y, Z$, now it's just a computation.

Actually, in this way you can prove that this kind of equality holds for every homogeneus polynomial (no matter how many variables) over any field $K$ while $n$ is not a divisor of $ch(K)$

Could we also take this polynomial: $F(X,Y,Z)=\sum_{i+j+k=n} a_{ijk} X^i Y^j Z^k$ ? (Thinking)

Could you explain me why we choose such a polynomial, that there is for example no constant term? (Thinking)
 
Hi evinda,

Both polynomials (yours and mine) are the same with different notation.

We choose such a polynomial because we want a homogeneus one of degree $n$.And this is more known as Euler's formula, but once a professors told me that it was originally proved by Leibniz, I haven't really found reliable information about this but I trust in my professor.
 

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K